Fact check: Why was Candace Owen’s fired from the daily wire

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Candace Owens was fired from The Daily Wire in March 2024 due to her promotion of antisemitic rhetoric and conspiracy theories ^{[1] [2]}. The departure occurred after public tensions and feuds with Ben Shapiro, the company's co-founder, over her antisemitic statements ^{[2] [3]}.

Multiple sources confirm that Owens had been a popular commentator for The Daily Wire since 2021 before her termination ^[1]. The firing was specifically attributed to her repeated embrace of antisemitic rhetoric despite her popularity at the outlet ^[1]. The situation involved public clashes with Ben Shapiro and other conservative figures within the organization ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual elements:

• Owens' history of controversial statements: The Anti-Defamation League describes her as having been criticized for anti-Semitic views and comments even before her Daily Wire departure ^[4]. She had previously defended Kanye West's anti-Semitic remarks and made her own antisemitic statements ^[5].
• Her broader pattern of behavior: Sources indicate that Owens' controversial statements may stem from her desire for attention and followers, not just her conservative political views ^[5]. This suggests the firing was part of a larger pattern rather than an isolated incident.
• Her media presence and influence: Owens has a large following on social media and had been hired by The Daily Wire to host her own show ^[4], making her departure particularly significant for the platform.
• Her background: The missing context includes her early days as a YouTuber and her work with Turning Point USA before joining The Daily Wire ^[5].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a grammatical error ("Owen's" instead of "Owens") but does not appear to contain factual misinformation. However, the phrasing is somewhat neutral and doesn't capture the severity of the situation - describing it simply as being "fired" rather than acknowledging it was specifically due to antisemitic rhetoric that created significant internal conflict at the organization.

The question also doesn't reflect that this was a high-profile departure involving public feuds between prominent conservative media figures, which would be relevant context for understanding the significance of the event.