What is the flower that Catherine o'hara wears on her jacket

1. A red‑carpet detail: what the coverage actually says

Photographs and fashion write‑ups from the Venice red carpet note that O’Hara’s black netted Oscar de la Renta gown featured sculptural details that “resembled frayed wires” and included “flower appliqués” along the off‑the‑shoulder neckline and sleeves, language that treats the floral element as an ornamented motif rather than a natural blossom ^[1]. The coverage specifically calls the embellishments “flower appliqués,” which in fashion reporting signals a crafted, textile‑based decoration, and it explicitly ties the garment to Oscar de la Renta as a custom piece—information that frames the flowers as design elements of the dress, not botanical accessories ^[1].

2. What the sources do not say — the crucial gap

Across the collection of articles and obituaries provided, there is no citation, designer note, or close‑up photograph described in the text that identifies the appliqués as a particular species (rose, camellia, orchid, etc.), nor is there confirmation that the flowers were fresh or detachable corsages; the reporting stops at describing the look as having “flower appliqués” and sculptural detailing ^[1]. Because the primary source here (InStyle’s Venice coverage) uses the fashion term “appliqué,” it’s reasonable to treat the embellishment as an intentional fabric or craft detail, but the absence of explicit attribution leaves the precise “what” of the flower unresolved in the available reporting ^[1].

3. How fashion language shapes the answer

When fashion outlets call something a “flower appliqué” they generally mean an applied decorative element—embroidered, sewn, or otherwise affixed—to a garment rather than a living bloom; that choice of wording comes from the InStyle report that described O’Hara’s dress ^[1]. Other profiles and retrospectives of O’Hara’s style confirm her habit of dramatic, crafted costume moments—ranging from Moira Rose’s crowns and wigs to bespoke red‑carpet choices—so contextual reading supports the interpretation that the floral detail was a crafted design element from the gown rather than a boutonnière or cut flower accessory ^{[2] [3]}.

4. What would confirm the species — and where to look next

To identify a specific flower species or determine whether the florals were real blooms, a direct source is needed: a designer credit or press release from Oscar de la Renta, a stylist’s statement, high‑resolution product/press photos with notes, or catalogue descriptors from the show or festival wardrobe team—none of which are present in the provided material ^[1]. Close‑up images from the Venice archives or a fashion house lookbook, or an interview with O’Hara’s stylist, would be the most reliable ways to move from “flower appliqué” to a botanical identification; absent those, the fair conclusion from current reporting is that the “flower” on her jacket/dress is a crafted appliqué by Oscar de la Renta and not identified as a particular flower species ^[1].

5. Conclusion: precise answer, with limits made explicit

The direct answer supported by the available reporting is that Catherine O’Hara’s garment featured flower appliqués—decorative, sculptural floral embellishments—on a custom Oscar de la Renta dress at Venice, but the sources do not identify a specific flower species or state that the flowers were real blossoms, leaving the exact botanical identity unconfirmed by the material provided ^[1]. Further confirmation would require designer or stylist documentation or close‑up attributed imagery not included in the supplied sources.