Fact check: I watch or listen to an actor that can entertain me for the two hour run time of a movie. I don't give a fuck about their political or social issues and really don't want to hear about them.

1. Summary of the results

The statement presents a simplified view of the entertainment industry that is both supported and challenged by various sources. While some actors like Scarlett Johansson agree that their primary role is entertainment ^[1], academic research shows that celebrities have become significant political influencers in modern society ^[2]. Harvard studies demonstrate that celebrities can effectively influence civic engagement and voter registration, particularly among younger demographics ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement overlooks several important aspects:

• Celebrities have proven to be effective catalysts for political change, with concrete examples like Taylor Swift's voter registration campaign and Kerry Washington's Influence Change initiative ^[4]
• There's an ongoing debate about celebrities' social responsibility, with some arguing they have an obligation to use their platform for positive social change ^[5]
• The boundaries between entertainment and political discourse have become increasingly blurred in modern society ^[2]
• Celebrities are "uniquely positioned to empower everyday Americans" in the political process ^[4]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement presents a false dichotomy between entertainment and political engagement:

• It assumes that actors can be purely entertainers without acknowledging their demonstrated influence on public opinion and civic engagement ^[2]
• The view benefits those who want to maintain status quo by delegitimizing celebrities' political influence
• Those supporting the statement's perspective, including some industry insiders, argue that actors should "stick to the script not the politics" ^[6]
• However, research shows that celebrities have become integral to modern political discourse and voter mobilization ^[3], suggesting that their role extends beyond mere entertainment whether audiences want it or not

The reality appears more complex than the original statement suggests, with valid arguments on both sides and significant evidence of celebrities' actual impact on political and social issues, regardless of individual viewers' preferences.