Fact check: What were the exact words used by Charlie Kirk that sparked outrage?

1. Summary of the results

The exact words used by Charlie Kirk that sparked outrage are only partially provided by one source, which states that Kirk replied, "Too many" when asked about the number of transgender Americans who have been mass shooters over the last 10 years, and later asked, "Counting or not counting gang violence?" in response to a follow-up question ^[1]. Other sources do not provide the exact words used by Kirk that sparked outrage, but instead discuss the aftermath of his death, including a coordinated online doxxing campaign targeting his critics ^[2], and the investigation into the motive of the shooting suspect ^[3]. Additionally, some sources mention that Kirk's comments on various topics, such as race, feminism, LGBTQ rights, and immigration, often drew sharp criticism ^[4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the full conversation or statement made by Charlie Kirk that led to the outrage, as only one source provides a partial quote ^[1]. Alternative viewpoints on the issue are also lacking, as most sources focus on the aftermath of Kirk's death rather than providing a nuanced discussion of his comments and their impact. For example, some sources mention that Kirk built his following by amplifying false claims and railing against "woke" culture ^[4], while others discuss the false claims made about him by others, such as Stephen King's statement that Kirk advocated stoning gays to death ^[5]. Furthermore, the sources do not provide a comprehensive view of the different perspectives on Kirk's comments and their implications, which would be necessary to fully understand the context and impact of his words ^{[2] [3] [4] [6] [7]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks for the exact words used by Charlie Kirk that sparked outrage, but the sources provided do not offer a clear or consistent answer, which may indicate that the statement is based on incomplete or misleading information ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [5] [7]}. Additionally, some sources may be biased in their presentation of Kirk's comments and their impact, as they often focus on the controversy and outrage surrounding his words rather than providing a balanced discussion of the issues ^{[2] [4]}. The sources that mention the aftermath of Kirk's death, including the firings of individuals who made comments about his death, may also be seen as biased, as they often frame these actions as a coordinated effort to silence critics ^[7]. Overall, the potential for misinformation and bias in the original statement and the sources provided highlights the need for careful evaluation and consideration of multiple perspectives when assessing the impact of Charlie Kirk's words ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [5] [7]}.