Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: At what time was Charlie Kirk shot?
1. Summary of the results
The original statement inquires about the time Charlie Kirk was shot. According to the analysis from [1], Charlie Kirk was shot at 12:23 p.m. MT on Wednesday, September 11, while answering audience questions at Utah Valley University [1]. However, the analyses from [2] and [3] do not provide a specific time for the shooting, but they both confirm that the incident occurred on September 10 [2] [3]. This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy of the date and time of the shooting. The analysis from [1] provides a specific time but differs in the date, stating September 11, whereas [2] and [3] agree on September 10 without providing a time [1] [2] [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Key details that are missing or inconsistent across the analyses include the exact date and time of the shooting. While [1] offers a precise time, it contradicts the dates provided by [2] and [3] [1] [2] [3]. Additionally, the circumstances surrounding the shooting, such as the events leading up to it and the immediate aftermath, are not uniformly described across the sources. For instance, [1] mentions Charlie Kirk was answering audience questions at Utah Valley University, but [2] and [3] do not provide such specific context about the location or the activities at the time of the shooting [1]. Understanding these aspects could provide a clearer picture of what happened. The sources also mention a suspect and potential charges, indicating a legal process is underway, but the focus of the inquiry is on the time of the shooting [2] [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement asks for the time Charlie Kirk was shot without specifying a date or context, which might imply that the date is already known or agreed upon [1] [2] [3]. However, the analyses reveal a discrepancy in the reported date of the incident, with [1] stating September 11 and [2] and [3] stating September 10 [1] [2] [3]. This discrepancy could lead to confusion or misinformation about the events surrounding Charlie Kirk's shooting. The sources [2] and [3] benefit from emphasizing the charges and the legal process against the suspect, potentially downplaying the importance of the exact timing of the shooting [2] [3]. In contrast, [1] provides a detailed timeline, which could be beneficial for understanding the sequence of events but may also be subject to scrutiny due to the discrepancy in the date [1].