What did Charlie kirk actually say about Simone Biles?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided confirm that Charlie Kirk made negative comments about Simone Biles in 2021, calling her a "sociopath" and a "shame to the country" after she withdrew from the Tokyo Olympics [1] [2] [3]. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Simone Biles responded to these comments after Charlie Kirk's death [1] [4]. In fact, multiple sources have debunked the claim that Biles wrote a blog post about Charlie Kirk after his death, stating that this claim is false and fabricated [4] [2] [1]. The sources consistently report that the rumor about Biles' response to Kirk's death is an example of misinformation spread on social media platforms, such as Facebook [2] [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key point missing from the original statement is the context of Charlie Kirk's comments about Simone Biles, which were made in 2021 after she withdrew from the Olympics [2] [3]. Additionally, the sources highlight the importance of verifying information through reputable sources to avoid spreading misinformation [2] [4]. Alternative viewpoints on the matter are not presented in the analyses, as the focus is primarily on fact-checking the claim about Simone Biles' response to Charlie Kirk's death [1]. However, it is worth noting that Charlie Kirk's comments about Simone Biles were widely criticized at the time, and the sources suggest that his remarks were inaccurate and unfair [3] [1].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading as it implies that Charlie Kirk's comments about Simone Biles are relevant to her response to his death, when in fact, there is no evidence to suggest that she responded to his comments after his death [1]. The sources suggest that the claim about Biles' response to Kirk's death is an example of misinformation spread on social media platforms, which can be damaging to individuals and communities [2] [4]. The bias in the original statement may be towards sensationalism, as it attempts to link Charlie Kirk's comments to Simone Biles' response, without providing evidence to support this claim [2] [1]. The sources that benefit from this framing are those that prioritize clickbait headlines and sensationalized content, rather than accurate and verifiable information [2] [4].