Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What exactly did Charlie Kirk say about Simone Biles?
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided confirm that Charlie Kirk made negative comments about Simone Biles in 2021, calling her a 'sociopath' and a 'shame to the country' after she withdrew from the Tokyo Olympics due to mental health reasons [1] [2] [3]. However, there is no evidence that Simone Biles responded to these comments after Charlie Kirk's death [1]. The analyses also debunk a false story spread on Facebook claiming Simone Biles wrote a blog about Charlie Kirk, confirming that the blog was fake and Biles made no statement [4] [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key point missing from the original statement is the context of Charlie Kirk's comments, which were made after Simone Biles withdrew from the Olympics due to a case of the 'twisties' [2]. Additionally, the original statement does not mention the widespread criticism Charlie Kirk faced for his comments, which were perceived as insensitive and dismissive of mental health concerns (not explicitly mentioned in the analyses, but implied by the fact that multiple sources felt the need to fact-check and debunk the claim that Simone Biles responded to Kirk's comments). Alternative viewpoints on the matter, such as the potential impact of Charlie Kirk's comments on the mental health conversation, are also not explored in the original statement (not explicitly mentioned in the analyses).
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading in that it implies Simone Biles made a statement about Charlie Kirk, when in fact, there is no evidence to support this claim [1] [4] [2]. This framing may benefit those who seek to perpetuate a narrative of conflict between Charlie Kirk and Simone Biles, potentially for political or ideological purposes (not explicitly stated in the analyses, but implied by the fact that the claim was spread on Facebook and debunked by fact-checkers). Furthermore, the original statement's focus on Charlie Kirk's comments about Simone Biles may distract from the broader conversation about mental health and the importance of supporting athletes who prioritize their well-being (not explicitly mentioned in the analyses, but implied by the context of the conversation).