Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did charlie kirk shame simone biles
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Yes, Charlie Kirk did shame Simone Biles on multiple occasions, with documented instances occurring in both 2021 and 2025. The evidence from multiple sources confirms that Kirk made harsh public criticisms of the Olympic gymnast.
In 2021, following Biles' withdrawal from several events at the Tokyo Olympics due to mental health concerns, Kirk launched a series of personal attacks against her. He called her "selfish," "immature," and "a sociopath" [1] [2]. Most notably, Kirk described Biles as "a shame to the country" for her decision to prioritize her mental health during the competition [2] [3]. These comments were made publicly and represented a direct attempt to shame Biles for her mental health struggles and Olympic withdrawal.
The shaming continued into 2025, where Kirk escalated his rhetoric further. Sources indicate he called Biles a "choke artist" and "basket case" [3], demonstrating that his criticism of the gymnast persisted years after the initial Tokyo Olympics controversy. This pattern shows that Kirk's shaming of Biles was not a one-time incident but rather an ongoing campaign of public criticism.
The nature of Kirk's comments goes beyond simple disagreement with Biles' decisions. By using terms like "sociopath" and questioning her patriotism by calling her "a shame to the country," Kirk engaged in what can definitively be characterized as public shaming [4]. One source specifically notes that Kirk "trashed Simone Biles for her mental health honesty, using cruel and exclusionary language" and promoted "harmful attitudes towards mental illness" [5].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks important context about the timeline and scope of Kirk's comments. The shaming wasn't limited to a single incident but occurred across multiple years, with documented instances in both 2021 and 2025 [4] [3]. This pattern suggests a sustained campaign rather than an isolated comment.
Additionally, the question doesn't address the broader context of mental health discourse in sports. Biles' withdrawal from Olympic events was specifically related to experiencing "the twisties" - a dangerous condition where gymnasts lose spatial awareness mid-air. Kirk's criticism came during a period when mental health awareness in athletics was gaining prominence, making his comments particularly controversial within that cultural moment.
The analyses also reveal that Kirk's 2025 comments extended beyond the original Olympics controversy to include criticism of Biles' views on transgender athletes [3], indicating that his shaming encompassed multiple aspects of her public positions, not just her Olympic withdrawal.
An important piece of missing context involves recent misinformation surrounding this topic. Multiple sources confirm that a viral Facebook post claiming Biles wrote a blog response to Kirk's comments was completely fabricated and AI-generated [1] [2]. This false narrative has complicated public understanding of the actual Kirk-Biles controversy.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself doesn't contain explicit misinformation, but its simplicity potentially understates the severity and persistence of Kirk's behavior. By asking merely "did Charlie Kirk shame Simone Biles," the question might lead readers to expect a simple yes/no answer about a single incident, when the reality involves multiple instances of increasingly harsh rhetoric over several years.
The phrasing could also inadvertently minimize the impact of Kirk's comments on mental health discourse. The sources indicate that Kirk's statements promoted "harmful attitudes towards mental illness" [5], suggesting his comments had broader implications beyond just criticizing one athlete.
However, the most significant misinformation risk comes from the viral fake blog post that has circulated on social media. Multiple sources emphasize that claims about Biles writing a response to Kirk are entirely false and AI-generated [1] [2] [3]. This fabricated content has created confusion about the actual facts of the Kirk-Biles controversy, potentially leading people to believe in non-existent responses or escalations that never occurred.
The persistence of this fake content demonstrates how AI-generated misinformation can complicate factual reporting about real controversies, creating layers of false narrative that obscure the documented facts of Kirk's actual shaming behavior toward Biles.