What were the main points of discussion between Charlie Kirk and Simone Biles?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the comprehensive analysis of multiple sources, there were no actual discussions or direct exchanges between Charlie Kirk and Simone Biles. The question itself appears to be based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship between these two public figures [1].
What actually occurred was a one-sided controversy where Charlie Kirk made critical comments about Simone Biles, particularly during the 2020 Tokyo Olympics when she withdrew from several events citing mental health concerns [2] [1]. Kirk's remarks were part of his broader commentary on social media, but Biles maintained professional silence and did not engage in any public discussion or debate with Kirk [2].
The situation became further complicated by Charlie Kirk's fatal shooting in September 2025, after which false rumors began circulating online [1]. These rumors falsely claimed that Biles had posted an emotional blog response detailing how Kirk's previous comments had affected her personally. However, extensive investigation found no evidence of such a blog post or any response from Biles [1] [3].
The misinformation spread through viral Facebook posts with AI-generated captions that referenced Kirk's 2021 comments about Biles, but these posts contained fabricated content and did not link to any actual blog post from the Olympic champion [3]. Multiple fact-checking sources have confirmed that the claim about Biles writing a blog post about Kirk is completely false [3] [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question fails to acknowledge several crucial contextual elements that fundamentally alter the narrative. First, the nature of Kirk's original comments during the 2020 Tokyo Olympics represented criticism of Biles' decision to prioritize her mental health, which became a significant cultural flashpoint about athlete welfare and societal expectations [2] [1].
The question also omits the tragic circumstances of Kirk's death in September 2025, which created a complex backdrop for how any potential response from Biles might be perceived by the public [1]. This timing is particularly significant because it explains why false rumors about Biles' supposed response gained traction - people were looking for reactions to Kirk's death from those he had previously criticized.
Another missing perspective is the broader pattern of misinformation that has surrounded both figures. The sources reveal that this incident is part of a larger problem with fake news and media manipulation on social media platforms, where AI-generated content and fabricated quotes are being used to create false narratives about public figures [3] [4].
The question also fails to consider Biles' consistent approach of maintaining professionalism and not engaging in public feuds, even when faced with criticism. This pattern of behavior makes the supposed blog post even more implausible, as it would represent a significant departure from her established public persona [2].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains inherent misinformation by assuming that discussions occurred between Kirk and Biles when no such exchanges took place. This assumption could mislead readers into believing there was a back-and-forth dialogue or debate between the two figures [1].
The phrasing "main points of discussion" suggests an equal exchange of ideas or arguments, which misrepresents the actual dynamic where Kirk made public comments about Biles without her participation or response. This framing could inadvertently legitimize or amplify Kirk's original criticisms by presenting them as part of a mutual discussion rather than one-sided commentary [2].
The question may also reflect the influence of viral misinformation that has circulated online, particularly the false claims about Biles' supposed blog post response. By asking about "discussions," the question might be inadvertently perpetuating the false narrative that Biles engaged with Kirk's comments in some public forum [3] [4].
Furthermore, the timing of this question, coming after Kirk's death, could be exploiting tragedy for engagement or attempting to resurrect old controversies in a new context. The sources emphasize that trusted verification of information is crucial in an era where AI-generated content and social media manipulation can easily create false narratives about public figures [4] [3].