Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What were Charlie Kirk's exact comments on Simone Biles' mental health?
Executive Summary
Charlie Kirk publicly criticized Simone Biles after her withdrawal from Olympic competition, using words framed by multiple outlets as “selfish,” “weak,” “immature,” and a “disgrace” or “shame”; those characterizations are documented in reporting dating from September 2025 but exact quoted phrasing varies across accounts [1] [2]. Subsequent reporting attributes additional insults such as “choke artist” and “basket case” to Kirk in 2025 coverage, and the episode reignited debate over mental health, media framing, and partisan motivations in commentary about elite athletes [2] [3].
1. How the comments were reported — blunt headlines, varied quotes
Multiple fact-check and news pieces from September 2025 summarize Charlie Kirk’s remarks about Simone Biles after she withdrew from event finals, with consistent reporting that Kirk called her “selfish,” “weak,” and “immature,” and suggested she had failed to live up to national expectations; some outlets report harsher terms like “a disgrace” or “a shame to the country” while others paraphrase his tone rather than publish a verbatim transcript [1] [2]. The coverage shows variation in exact wording, indicating reporters relied on different clips, contexts, and interpretations when labeling Kirk’s comments.
2. Which outlets reported what — patterns and differences
Reporting clusters around a few interpretations: some pieces present direct quotes attributed to Kirk using the harsher terms, while other fact-checking articles summarize the substance and context without reproducing verbatim insults [2]. The diversity of accounts means no single verbatim record appears consistently across the sample set, and summaries are influenced by each outlet’s sourcing choices. This pattern suggests journalists synthesized public statements and social media commentary, creating disparate but overlapping narratives about the same remarks [4].
3. Context matters — the Tokyo withdrawal and later exchanges
The original public controversy traces to Biles’ withdrawal from Tokyo Olympic finals for mental health reasons; Kirk’s criticism referenced that decision and framed it as a failure to withstand pressure on behalf of the country [1]. Later exchanges in 2025 reportedly expanded the dispute, with Kirk making additional personal attacks tied to Biles’ public stances, such as on transgender athlete participation, according to follow-up reporting [2]. Those timeline details show the initial criticism and subsequent escalation were reported as distinct but connected episodes.
4. What Biles and her representatives said — notable absences
Across the sampled reports, several outlets note that Simone Biles did not issue a detailed public rebuttal to all of Kirk’s comments and that some claims of responses circulating on social media were debunked by fact-checkers [5]. The absence of a full documented exchange from Biles’ side contributed to media efforts to paraphrase or contextualize Kirk’s words, which increased the variation in how his remarks were reported [5] [6].
5. Why reporters flagged bias and agenda — partisan optics
Coverage and fact-check pieces flagged potential partisan motives, noting that the framing of Biles’ decision as a character failing fits a broader conservative critique of athletes who center mental health and social positions, while critics accused Kirk of weaponizing the moment for political messaging [3] [7]. Fact-checkers and explainers emphasized that the dispute sits at the intersection of sports, politics, and mental-health discourse, which media outlets contextualized differently depending on editorial priorities [7].
6. Key contested phrases — what the record reliably supports
Across sources there is reliable agreement that Kirk called Biles selfish, weak, and immature when criticizing her Tokyo withdrawal, and that later 2025 commentary included more vitriolic labels attributed to him in some reports [1] [2]. What remains contested in the sampled material is the exact wording and whether some harsher epithets were direct quotes or paraphrases used by journalists to summarize a broader pattern of attacks [4]. That nuance matters for any precise attribution.
7. What independent fact-checkers concluded — debunks and clarifications
Fact-check efforts in late September 2025 sought to debunk viral misattributions — for example, false claims about Biles writing mocking blog posts after Kirk’s death were debunked, and privacy-policy or irrelevant pages were identified as misleading search hits [5] [6]. These fact-checks underline that some viral claims around the controversy were false or unsupported, even as multiple outlets accurately documented Kirk’s critical commentary [5].
8. Bottom line for readers seeking the exact quote
If you need a verbatim quote, the available reporting shows consistent themes but not a single universally confirmed sentence; multiple outlets cite terms like “selfish,” “weak,” and “a disgrace/shame,” while some associate additional epithets such as “choke artist” and “basket case” with later remarks in 2025 [1] [2]. For an exact transcript or legal attribution, consult the original clip or primary source release referenced by each article; absent that, rely on cross-checked reports which agree on the substance even when phrasing differs [2] [3].