What were Charlie Kirk's initial comments on Simone Biles' withdrawal from the Olympics?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided confirm that Charlie Kirk made comments about Simone Biles in 2021, after she withdrew from the Olympics due to mental health reasons [1]. Specifically, Kirk called her a 'sociopath', 'weak', 'very selfish', 'immature', 'a shame to the country', and 'a disgrace' [1]. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Simone Biles responded to these comments after Charlie Kirk's death [1] [2] [3]. The analyses also debunk the claim that Simone Biles wrote a blog post about Charlie Kirk after his death, stating that this claim is false and AI-generated [2] [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the motivation behind Charlie Kirk's comments about Simone Biles [4]. Some analyses suggest that Kirk's comments were part of his cruel and exclusionary attitudes [4], while others simply report on the fact that he made these comments without providing additional context [1]. Alternative viewpoints on this issue might include mental health advocates who criticize Kirk's comments as harmful and stigmatizing [4], as well as supporters of Charlie Kirk who might argue that his comments were justified or taken out of context. Additionally, some analyses mention that Charlie Kirk made remarks about Simone Biles in 2025, saying 'unlike you, Riley never quit when things got hard' in response to one of her posts [1], which could be seen as a continuation of his criticism of Biles.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement asks about Charlie Kirk's initial comments on Simone Biles' withdrawal from the Olympics, but does not provide any context about why these comments are relevant or what the implications of these comments might be [1]. This lack of context could be seen as misleading or incomplete, as it does not provide a full picture of the issue. Furthermore, the fact that the original statement does not mention the false claim that Simone Biles wrote a blog post about Charlie Kirk after his death [2] [3] could be seen as a bias towards presenting only one side of the story. The sources that benefit from this framing are likely those that support Charlie Kirk's views or seek to criticize Simone Biles, while those that might be harmed by this framing are mental health advocates and supporters of Simone Biles [4].