Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What was the public reaction to Charlie Kirk's statements about Simone Biles on social media?

Checked on September 19, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The public reaction to Charlie Kirk's statements about Simone Biles on social media is not directly addressed in the provided analyses [1]. However, it is clear that Simone Biles did not write a blog post about Charlie Kirk, despite viral Facebook claims suggesting otherwise [2] [3] [4] [5]. These claims were based on false information and were likely generated using AI to spread misinformation [3]. The sources confirm that there is no evidence of Simone Biles commenting on Charlie Kirk's statements or his death [5] [2]. The reaction to Charlie Kirk's death is discussed in some analyses, with many people facing consequences for their social media posts about the incident [1], and calls for accountability from Republican officials [6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the actual statements made by Charlie Kirk about Simone Biles, which are not mentioned in the provided analyses [2] [3] [4] [5]. Additionally, the analyses do not provide information on the broader public reaction to Charlie Kirk's statements about Simone Biles, beyond the fact that the claims about her blog post were false [1] [6] [7]. Alternative viewpoints on the issue are not presented in the analyses, which primarily focus on debunking the false claims about Simone Biles' blog post [2] [3] [4]. It is also worth noting that the sources do not provide a balanced view of the public reaction to Charlie Kirk's death, with some analyses focusing on the condemnation of political violence [7] and others discussing the pressure on social media platforms to police content [6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be based on misinformation or bias, as it assumes that Charlie Kirk made statements about Simone Biles and that there was a public reaction to these statements on social media [1]. The analyses suggest that the claims about Simone Biles' blog post were false and AI-generated [3], which may indicate an attempt to spread misinformation or manipulate public opinion [4]. The sources that benefit from this framing are likely those that seek to criticize or undermine Charlie Kirk or Simone Biles, as the false claims about the blog post may be used to support a particular narrative or agenda [5] [2]. However, it is also possible that the original statement is simply incomplete or inaccurate, and that further information is needed to fully understand the public reaction to Charlie Kirk's statements about Simone Biles [1] [6] [7].

Want to dive deeper?
What were Charlie Kirk's exact statements about Simone Biles on social media?
How did Simone Biles respond to Charlie Kirk's comments on Twitter?
What was the reaction of the gymnastics community to Charlie Kirk's statements about Simone Biles?
Did Charlie Kirk face any backlash from his own organization or sponsors over his comments about Simone Biles?
How did other public figures and celebrities respond to Charlie Kirk's statements about Simone Biles on social media?