Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
$

Fact check: Would a Colbert, Maddow, and Kimmel news network be available on major streaming platforms?

Checked on October 22, 2025

Executive Summary

A verified, joint news network fronted by Stephen Colbert, Rachel Maddow and Jimmy Kimmel is not supported by the available reporting; fact-checking found the specific "Truth News" collaboration claim false and likely AI-generated to drive clicks. Major-platform availability therefore cannot be confirmed because the underlying project appears not to exist in reputable reporting, though individual shows and liberal commentary are accessible on many streaming services [1] [2] [3]. The key takeaway: there is no verifiable announcement of a Colbert–Maddow–Kimmel news network, so no firm claims about platform carriage can be made.

1. How the core claim unravels under scrutiny: a manufactured project, not a network launch

Fact-checking organizations concluded that the specific story alleging a collaborative "Truth News" channel involving Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen Colbert and Simon Cowell (and by extension Maddow in some iterations) is false; Snopes identified the item as likely AI-generated viral content with no corroboration from reputable outlets, undermining the premise that a new network exists to be carried by streamers [1]. This determination removes the basic factual foundation required to assess platform availability: if the project was never announced by the principals or their employers, platform carriage discussions are speculative at best and rooted in misinformation rather than concrete distribution negotiations.

2. What the provided platform-related signals actually show: individual shows vs. a unified channel

Existing reporting shows that individual late-night shows and news programs continue to have varied streaming access, but that is distinct from a unified new network. For example, Jimmy Kimmel Live! returns to ABC with streaming access via DirecTV, Hulu + Live TV, or Fubo where local stations do not carry it, illustrating that program-level distribution can bypass linear carriage disputes [4]. This demonstrates how major streaming platforms routinely carry individual programs or linear feeds, but such precedent does not equate to an automatic pathway for a new, unannounced joint network fronted by Colbert, Maddow and Kimmel.

3. Platform appetite and technical feasibility: streamers carry news, but deals are required

Major streaming services already carry legacy news channels and program feeds—MSNBC, CNN and others are available on several live-TV platforms and streaming bundles—showing there is technical and commercial precedent for adding a channel [5]. However, platform carriage depends on contractual agreements between content owners and distributors; the mere existence of talent does not guarantee a carriage deal. Given that no content owner or talent representatives confirmed a joint network, there is no record of negotiations that would predict whether Hulu, Sling, Fubo, or others would carry such a channel.

4. Alternative venues and the modern progressive ecosystem: independent streaming is viable

A separate trend highlights that progressive commentary increasingly thrives on independent streaming and digital-first platforms. Figures like Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur have built audiences on YouTube and Twitch, indicating that prominent left-leaning hosts can reach large audiences without traditional cable carriage [3]. If Colbert, Maddow and Kimmel were to pursue a joint venture, they would have multiple technical avenues—linear carriage deals, streaming bundles, or direct-to-consumer platforms—but absent an announcement, speculation about which route they would choose remains unconstrained by evidence.

5. How misinformation narratives propagate and why platform-availability questions follow

The viral item flagged by fact-checkers appears to follow a familiar pattern: sensational collaborations attract clicks, then secondary narratives ask about distribution and availability on major platforms. Snopes and other analyses show the original story lacked credible sourcing, and follow-up content about where the network would stream is a derivative question built on a false premise [1]. Understanding this chain clarifies that correcting the origin myth resolves downstream uncertainties: there is no announced channel to be added to streaming catalogs.

6. What is verifiable today about individual talent distribution rights and carriage friction

Existing reporting about Jimmy Kimmel's broadcast return underscores how carriage friction affects availability: station groups (Sinclair, Nexstar) may choose not to air a program, pushing viewers to stream alternatives; streaming services often pick up access in those scenarios [4]. This suggests that even high-profile hosts face distribution variability and that any new project would require explicit licensing agreements. The absence of statements from networks, talent, or platforms in the sources provided means no factual claim can be made about where a hypothetical Colbert–Maddow–Kimmel network would be available.

7. Bottom line and recommended verification steps for readers tracking this story

Given the evidence, the accurate conclusion is that no verifiable Colbert–Maddow–Kimmel news network has been announced, so questions about availability on major streaming platforms are premature. Readers should rely on primary confirmations—announcements from the talent, their networks, or platform press releases—rather than viral posts. To verify future claims, check reputable fact-checkers and major outlets for dated confirmations and watch for explicit carriage agreements from streaming providers before accepting platform-availability assertions [1] [4] [5] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Would a Colbert, Maddow, and Kimmel news network be available on Netflix?
Can I stream MSNBC and late-night shows on Hulu?
How does the availability of liberal news networks compare across Amazon Prime, YouTube TV, and Apple TV?
What are the most popular streaming platforms for news content in 2025?
Would a dedicated liberal news network be viable on major streaming platforms like Disney+ or HBO Max?