Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What other factors have contributed to Disney's subscriber loss since 2024?
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that multiple factors have contributed to Disney's subscriber loss since 2024. According to [1], the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! led to a boycott of Disney's streaming services, resulting in many subscribers cancelling their accounts in protest, contributing to Disney's subscriber loss [1]. Additionally, [2] and [3] suggest that Disney's increase in prices for its streaming services, including Disney+, may have also contributed to the loss of subscribers, as some users may be sensitive to price changes and seek alternative options [2] [3]. Furthermore, [4] and [5] indicate that the controversy surrounding Jimmy Kimmel's suspension has resulted in a significant wave of backlash, with many fans cancelling their Disney and Hulu subscriptions, which may have a short-term and long-term impact on Disney's revenue and brand reputation [4] [5]. Other factors, such as competitive pressures and rising production costs, may also contribute to subscriber loss, as noted in [6] [6]. Moreover, [7] suggests that Disney+'s emphasis on producing content for its streaming service has damaged the Marvel brand, with Kevin Feige admitting that the expansion was 'too much' and 'devalued' the brand [7].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key missing context in the original statement is the timing and magnitude of the subscriber loss, which is only partially addressed in [3] and [2], noting that Disney+ lost 700,000 subscribers in Q1 2025 [3] [2]. Another alternative viewpoint is the impact of external factors, such as extreme weather, on Disney's domestic parks and experiences business, which is mentioned in [2] [2]. Furthermore, [8] notes that Disney is raising prices again for its streaming services, which could be a contributing factor to subscriber loss [8]. It is also worth considering the competitive landscape, as mentioned in [6], where competitors like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video leverage ad-supported tiers and bundling to challenge Disney's IP-driven ecosystem [6]. The long-term effects of the Jimmy Kimmel controversy and the price hikes on Disney's brand reputation and subscriber base are also not fully explored in the original statement, but are discussed in [4] and [5] [4] [5].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be biased towards attributing the subscriber loss to a single factor, such as the Jimmy Kimmel controversy, when in fact, the analyses suggest that multiple factors are at play [1] [2] [4] [7] [3] [8] [5] [6]. Additionally, the statement may overemphasize the impact of the Jimmy Kimmel controversy, when other factors, such as price increases and competitive pressures, may be more significant contributors to the subscriber loss [2] [3] [6]. The sources [1], [4], and [5], which focus on the Jimmy Kimmel controversy, may benefit from emphasizing this factor, as it generates attention and publicity for their reporting [1] [4] [5]. On the other hand, sources [7] and [6], which discuss the competitive landscape and Disney's pricing strategy, may benefit from highlighting these factors, as they provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex issues facing Disney's streaming services [7] [6].