Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has disney lost 4 billion from subscription cancellations as boycott over Kimmel firing?
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The original statement claims that Disney has lost $4 billion from subscription cancellations due to a boycott over the firing of Jimmy Kimmel. While some sources report on the boycott and its potential impact on Disney's revenue, not all sources confirm the $4 billion loss [1] [2] [3] [4]. However, some sources do report significant financial losses, with one source stating that Disney faces a $3.8 billion loss due to the boycott [5], and another source reporting that Disney lost nearly $4 billion in market value since suspending Jimmy Kimmel [6]. Additionally, a source mentions a wave of cancellations on Disney+, which could support the claim of significant financial losses [7]. The stock price of Disney has also been affected, with a 3.5% drop after news of Kimmel's sidelining broke [8], and a 2% drop equating to a loss of approximately $4.4 billion [7].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the official confirmation of the financial loss from Disney, as most sources rely on reports and analyses rather than official statements [1] [5] [2] [3] [4]. Additionally, the long-term impact of the boycott on Disney's revenue is unclear, with some sources suggesting that the backlash may be short-lived and may not have a significant impact on Disney's revenue [4]. The motivations behind the boycott and the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show are also not fully explored in the provided analyses, which could provide further context on the situation [1] [5] [9]. Different stakeholders may have different perspectives on the situation, including Disney, Jimmy Kimmel, and the fans boycotting the company, which could provide a more nuanced understanding of the issue [1] [2] [8].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or exaggerated, as not all sources confirm the $4 billion loss [1] [2] [3] [4]. Additionally, the statement implies a direct causal link between the boycott and the $4 billion loss, which may not be entirely accurate, as the sources suggest that the financial losses may be due to a combination of factors, including the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show and the subsequent backlash [5] [6] [7]. The statement may benefit those who are opposed to Disney's decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel's show, as it amplifies the potential consequences of the decision and puts pressure on the company to reconsider [1] [2] [8]. On the other hand, the statement may be detrimental to Disney's reputation and stock price, as it suggests a significant financial loss due to the boycott, which could lead to further economic consequences [8] [6] [7].