Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
$

Fact check: The creatives in control of Doctor Who for the past 5 years have shown nothing but contempt and loathing for the older fan base.

Checked on April 9, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement oversimplifies a complex situation regarding Doctor Who's creative direction and fan reception. While there is evidence of fan criticism towards Russell T. Davies' writing style and storytelling approach [1], the situation is more nuanced. The BBC has indeed undergone significant changes, with Bad Wolf production company taking over creative control from season 14 [2]. While some creative decisions have been controversial and potentially alienating to parts of the fan base [3], the show has historically experienced similar challenges and rating fluctuations throughout its run [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:

  • The show's ratings decline is part of a broader trend in television consumption, with multiple streaming platforms competing for viewers' attention [5]
  • Some criticism appears to be mixed with racist and homophobic backlash against the new Doctor, Ncuti Gatwa, rather than purely creative concerns [6]
  • The show has a long-standing tradition of regeneration and change, which both Gatwa and Davies argue is fundamental to its identity [7]
  • Rating fluctuations are not unique to the current era, as similar patterns occurred during the classic series [4]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement shows several biases:

  • It presents a false dichotomy between "creatives" and "older fan base," ignoring that fan reactions are diverse and complex
  • The use of strong terms like "contempt and loathing" appears emotionally charged rather than factual
  • The statement ignores the possibility that some criticism may be rooted in resistance to change rather than genuine creative concerns [7]

Who benefits from these narratives:

  • Traditional media outlets benefit from amplifying controversy and division within the fan base
  • The BBC benefits from dismissing fan concerns and maintaining optimism about the show's direction [8]
  • Bad Wolf production company benefits from positioning themselves as potential "saviors" of the show's creative direction [2]
  • Critics of diversity initiatives in media may benefit from conflating creative criticism with resistance to casting choices [6]
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?