Fact check: The Timeless Child retcon of Doctor Who was absolute dogshit.

1. Summary of the results

1. Summary of the results: The analyses confirm that the statement "The Timeless Child retcon of Doctor Who was absolute dogshit" expresses a strongly negative subjective opinion. While the retcon is undeniably controversial and has divided the fanbase, the analyses also present arguments and perspectives that offer a more nuanced view of the change, including the BBC's rationale and the opinions of key figures involved with the show. The analyses highlight both potential benefits and shortcomings of the retcon.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints: The analyses predominantly focus on immediate reactions and the controversy surrounding the retcon. Missing context could include longer-term fan reception and critical analysis, any subsequent storylines that build upon or address the Timeless Child arc, and how the retcon potentially impacted the show's ratings and overall popularity. Alternative viewpoints could come from casual viewers who are less invested in established canon, or from fans who appreciate the new mysteries and possibilities introduced by the retcon. A deeper exploration of how the Timeless Child arc affected representation within the show would also be valuable.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement: The primary bias lies in the hyperbolic and dismissive language ("absolute dogshit"). This strong negative framing presents a subjective opinion as objective fact. The statement lacks nuance and ignores the complexities surrounding the retcon, including the range of fan reactions and the showrunners' intentions. By presenting a personal opinion as definitive, it potentially misinforms those unfamiliar with the details of the controversy.