Does the singer marshmallow support trump

1. The question being asked and why it matters

Asking whether "the singer Marshmello supports Trump" is a query about a specific public figure’s political stance, and conflates a person with a widely used cultural object and metaphor; the documents provided focus on marshmallow imagery applied to Donald Trump—ranging from critiques to cartoons—rather than on the musician who uses the name and mask "Marshmello" ^{[1] [4] [2]}. Determining an artist’s political support matters for readers because celebrity political endorsements can influence public perception and voting, yet such claims require direct evidence—statements, donations, endorsements or actions attributable to the artist—which are not present in the supplied reporting.

2. What the supplied reporting actually contains: metaphors, cartoons and mockery

The available pieces largely use "marshmallow" as a rhetorical device: Psychology Today analyzes the old Stanford marshmallow experiment to read behavioral clues into Trump’s psychology (delay discounting) rather than to comment on any musician ^[1], the New Yorker cartoon reproduced in other outlets uses a marshmallow gag about presidential temptation ^{[4] [2]}, and Politico records Trump himself mocking Hillary Clinton as "like a marshmallow" in a campaign remark ^[3]. Opinion writers and commentators also liken Trump to the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man as a cultural metaphor for perceived menace and absurdity ^{[5] [6]}, while a popular tabloid piece recounts a Halloween candy moment involving Trump ^[7]. None of these items present reporting on the electronic music artist Marshmello or on any political endorsement from that artist.

3. Limits of inference: why metaphors are not evidence of endorsement

Using the term "marshmallow" to lampoon or define Trump in political commentary (as in Politico’s quote of Trump or the New Yorker cartoon) does not connect to the artist Marshmello; metaphors and cultural nicknames can create associative noise that leads to mistaken inferences if readers conflate symbol and person ^{[3] [4]}. The supplied sources demonstrate the concept’s rhetorical mobility—appearing in psychological pieces, cartoons and op-eds ^{[1] [2] [5]}—which underscores why one cannot treat those usages as evidence that any individual entertainer shares political allegiance.

4. Alternative explanations and potential agendas in these sources

The pieces come from disparate genres—psychology commentary, political reporting, satire and opinion—and each has its own implicit agenda: analysis of behavioral traits (Psychology Today) aims to apply psychological frameworks to political figures ^[1], cartoons aim to provoke or satirize inauguration dynamics ^{[4] [2]}, and opinion pieces dramatize political danger through pop-culture analogies ^{[5] [6]}. That diversity increases the chance that readers will conflate rhetorical flourish with documentary fact; none of the supplied sources sought to investigate or document a celebrity endorsement by the artist Marshmello.

5. Final assessment: what can and cannot be concluded from the provided material

Based solely on the supplied reporting, there is no evidence that the singer Marshmello supports Donald Trump, because the documents supplied do not address the artist at all and instead use marshmallow-related imagery to discuss Trump or mock other politicians ^{[1] [3] [4] [5]}. It remains possible that independent reporting, statements, social-media posts, donation records, or interviews outside these sources could show support or opposition by the artist, but those items are not in the material provided and thus cannot be asserted here.