Fact check: Dragon Age The Veilgaurd was a shit game with shit writing and shit gameplay. It deserved to fail.

1. Summary of the results

The original statement's harsh criticism appears to be unsupported by professional reviews and technical analyses. Multiple sources indicate that Dragon Age: The Veilguard received generally positive reviews, with critics noting that BioWare has delivered a convincing game following their previous title Anthem ^[1]. The game features an immersive single-player RPG experience focused on uniting the Veilguard and confronting gods ^[2], with sophisticated combat mechanics including combo systems, skill trees, and tactical pausing features ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement lacks several crucial pieces of context:

• The game features a complex combat system with multiple layers of strategy and tactical options ^[3]
• Reviews highlight strong production values, including praised graphics, sound design, and character creation systems ^[4]
• While not achieving a 90+ review score, critics generally agree that BioWare has learned from previous mistakes and improved upon their formula ^[1]
• The game offers deep character customization and an immersive narrative experience ^[5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement appears to be an emotional reaction rather than a balanced critique. Several factors should be considered:

• The statement provides no specific examples or reasoning for its criticism
• Professional critics have provided detailed technical analyses that contradict the blanket negative assessment ^{[4] [3]}
• There may be bias from:
• Fans disappointed with previous BioWare titles (as referenced by the mention of Anthem's failure) ^[1]
• Those expecting a different type of gameplay experience
• Competitors or detractors of BioWare who benefit from negative publicity

While the game may not be perfect, with some noted minor issues like limited crafting and bugs ^[4], the available professional reviews and technical analyses paint a significantly more positive picture than the original statement suggests.