Fact check: Does earache records fuck over their artists?

1. Summary of the results

1. Summary of the results:

Multiple artists have reported serious issues with Earache Records, including:

• Dan Seagrave's allegations of unauthorized artwork usage
• The Browning's claims of removed albums and unpaid royalties
• Decapitated's ongoing legal battle over 10 years of allegedly unpaid royalties
• Bolt Thrower's previous criticism regarding unauthorized reissues

Legal expert Daniel Katz has described the label as "cavalier with the rights of others"

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints:

• Earache Records' perspective is notably absent from all analyses, as they consistently declined to respond
• Most bands approached were unwilling to comment on record, suggesting either fear of retaliation or possible non-disclosure agreements
• The music industry's standard practices and typical royalty arrangements aren't discussed, making it difficult to compare Earache's behavior to industry norms
• The financial challenges of running an independent metal label aren't addressed, which could provide context for payment delays or disputes

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement:

• The informal phrasing "fuck over" oversimplifies complex legal and business relationships
• The statement assumes uniform treatment of all artists, when experiences likely vary
• It ignores that artists who have positive experiences with the label are less likely to speak publicly
• The question doesn't acknowledge that artists who feel wronged have financial incentive to publicly criticize the label, while satisfied artists have little motivation to defend it

The evidence suggests serious concerns about Earache Records' business practices, but a complete assessment would require the label's perspective and broader industry context.