Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: By giving Emelia Perez 13 nominations, the Academy awards have completely forfeited any semblance of authority on what constitutes a competent, let alone good film.

Checked on February 7, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement oversimplifies a complex situation surrounding "Emilia Pérez." While the film did receive 13 Oscar nominations, making it the most nominated non-English language film in Oscar history [1], its reception has been notably mixed. The film has received a 76% critic score but significantly lower audience scores, ranging from 33% to 19% on Rotten Tomatoes [2] [3]. It's worth noting that the film has been successful in other major awards, including record-setting nominations at the Golden Globes and BAFTAs [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • The film is a Spanish-language, French-made Netflix production directed by Jacques Audiard [1]
  • It has achieved historic milestones, including nominations for the first trans actor [1]
  • There is significant controversy surrounding:
    • The film's portrayal of Mexican culture, with Mexican film critic Ricardo Gallegos Ramos stating it has "united Mexico" in disliking it [5]
    • Lead actor Karla Sofía Gascón's controversial social media posts about Muslims, George Floyd, and diverse Oscar winners [6]
    • LGBTQ+ representation, with GLAAD labeling it "Not Good Trans Representation" [7]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents a one-sided view that ignores several key factors:

  • Industry Recognition: While the statement dismisses the Academy's judgment, the film has received widespread industry recognition beyond just the Oscars [4]
  • Complex Reception: Rather than being universally poor, the film has sparked nuanced debates about representation, authenticity, and cultural portrayal [5] [7]
  • Broader Context: The nominations come during a challenging time for Hollywood, dealing with wildfires and industry disruption [1]

Who Benefits:

  • Netflix benefits from the controversy and nominations as the film's distributor [1]
  • The French film industry benefits from international recognition [1]
  • Critics and cultural commentators benefit from the ongoing debates about representation and authenticity
  • The Academy itself benefits from appearing progressive while generating discussion about their nominations
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?