Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What public events have Erika Kirk and Candace Owens attended together?
Executive Summary
Public reporting shows the only confirmed public occasion where Erika Kirk and Candace Owens appeared in the same news cycle or venue was Charlie Kirk’s memorial events in mid‑September 2025, but sources disagree on whether they physically attended the same onstage moments and on Owens’s role in the program. Contemporary accounts document Erika Kirk speaking at the memorial and Candace Owens reacting publicly — by podcast and media commentary — with some outlets saying both were present at the State Farm Stadium gathering and others noting Owens watched or spoke remotely [1] [2] [3].
1. Who said they saw both women together — and what they reported about the memorial spectacle
Several outlets report Erika Kirk delivered a public tribute at Charlie Kirk’s memorial, and Candace Owens publicly reacted to that tribute, creating the impression of joint public involvement tied to the same event. Reporting describes Erika as speaking at the memorial, with Owens praising the speech on her podcast and in media reactions [2] [4]. One source frames Owens as claiming she was snubbed from the in‑person speaking roster while Erika controlled the event and spoke alongside other figures, which positions both women within the same memorial narrative but not necessarily sharing a staged appearance [1].
2. Disputes over physical attendance and who actually stood together
Accounts diverge on whether Owens physically attended the memorial or appeared only by audio/video or subsequent commentary. Some reporting states both women attended the State Farm Stadium memorial in Glendale, Arizona, and that Erika spoke there while Owens reacted and praised the tribute [2]. Other pieces stress Owens did not speak at the funeral in Arizona and instead watched televised speeches by Tucker Carlson and Erika Kirk, undercutting claims of a joint podium appearance [3]. These conflicting claims reflect differing sourcing and possible conflation between presence at the venue and later public commentary.
3. Social‑media signals, followings, and why observers drew connections
Observers have noted social‑media interactions and prior histories within Turning Point USA as reasons people linked Erika and Owens, including reports that Erika followed Owens on Instagram and recollections of long‑standing associations through activism networks [5] [6]. One analysis emphasizes that Erika following Owens predated recent events, undermining narratives portraying the follow as an opportunistic post‑memorial gesture [7]. Reporting that Owens and Erika once worked around Turning Point USA and that Owens helped plot Charlie Kirk’s proposal to Erika offers context for why observers assumed public alignment [6].
4. Media framing and contested claims about being “snubbed” or excluded
Reporting highlights tensions about who was included on the memorial speaking roster and whether Owens was intentionally excluded, with Owens publicly characterizing herself as snubbed while others report that Erika oversaw the program [1]. That framing serves competing agendas: narratives of internal conservative feuding and narratives of Erika’s ascendancy in controlling memorial messaging. Sources present both the claim of a snub and the organizational reality of Erika’s role at the event, but they stop short of independently verifying the roster decision‑making process or internal communications [1] [8].
5. How each outlet treated verifiability and the limits of public evidence
Different reports treat available evidence variably: some rely on on‑the‑ground descriptions of a stadium memorial and podcast reactions, while others flag the absence of a clear record proving Owens and Erika shared the same live stage [2] [3]. One outlet traces Owens’s televised viewing of speeches and her post‑event commentary rather than a live testimony, and another notes the Instagram‑follow timing to rebut viral claims [3] [7]. This divergence underscores the limits of public data: presence at a large memorial can produce overlapping but nonidentical public footprints.
6. The big picture: what is established, what remains contested, and why it matters
What is established: Erika Kirk publicly spoke in connection with Charlie Kirk’s memorial, and Candace Owens publicly reacted and claimed she was sidelined from some in‑person speaking opportunities [2] [1]. What is contested: whether Owens and Erika physically attended the same in‑person moments at the stadium and whether Owens’s absence from the speaking roster was intentional exclusion [3] [1]. The dispute matters because reporting has fueled narratives about factionalism inside conservative networks and shaped public perceptions of control over memorial messaging and influence among high‑profile conservative figures [6] [4].
7. Bottom line for the reader seeking a clear answer
Based on the available contemporary reporting, the clearest supported claim is that both women were central figures in the memorial story — Erika as an in‑person speaker and Owens as a prominent commentator — but definitive evidence that they attended or spoke together on the same public stage is mixed and unresolved. Readers should treat accounts claiming a joint onstage appearance as contested and consult primary event records or video timestamps if a conclusive determination is required [2] [3] [1].