Have any former Alligator Alcatraz locations reopened under a different name or ownership?

1. The facility in question: not a chain with multiple “locations”

Reporting describes “Alligator Alcatraz” as a specific detention site — the South Florida Detention Facility at Dade‑Collier Training and Transition Airport in the Everglades — opened in July 2025 and built to hold thousands of migrants; sources treat it as one central, state‑run facility supporting federal immigration operations rather than a network of sites that could be closed and later reopened under different names ^{[1] [7]}.

2. No sourced reporting of any reopened sites under different names

Investigations, local and national reporting, legal filings and NGO reports concentrate on the single Everglades facility’s operations, conditions and litigation. None of the supplied sources report that any former Alligator Alcatraz location was closed and then reopened under alternate ownership or a different name; available sources do not mention any such rebranding or transfer ^{[2] [4] [8] [6]}.

3. Courts and officials focused on keeping it open, not shuttering then relaunching under new management

When judges intervened in 2025, coverage emphasized stays and appeals that allowed construction or operations to continue, or threatened closure with financial consequences for Florida — not sale or transfer of the site to new owners who might relaunch it under a different brand ^{[2] [9] [10]}.

4. Investigations emphasize detainee disappearances and abuses, not venue re‑use

Longform reporting and NGO work documented disappearance of detainees from ICE databases and serious allegations of inhumane treatment at the Everglades site. These stories focus on detainee tracking, legal access and humanitarian conditions rather than on property‑level changes in ownership or name ^{[4] [8] [6] [7]}.

5. Environmental and financial disputes suggest political stakes, not routine facility turnover

Local environmental groups and news outlets framed the conflict as one over NEPA compliance, environmental harm and large fiscal exposure (e.g., potential costs of $218 million if closed) — dynamics consistent with a politically charged, state‑operated detention hub rather than a commercial facility likely to be sold and reopened under another banner ^{[5] [9]}.

6. Where to watch next — what would indicate a reopened, renamed site

If a former Alligator Alcatraz site were being repurposed or reopened under different ownership, expect reporting to document: a deed/ownership transfer, a new operating lease or contractor, new signage and an official renaming, and filings in court or local government permitting those changes. None of the current articles and investigations cite any of those markers ^{[2] [1] [3]}.

7. Limitations and alternative readings in the record

Sources are numerous and contemporaneous but concentrate on operational, legal and human‑rights developments at the Everglades site. That leaves open the theoretical possibility of future rebranding or property transfer not yet reported. For now, however, the supplied reporting contains no evidence that any former Alligator Alcatraz location reopened under a different name or owner ^{[4] [8] [6]}.

If you want, I can scan these outlets for any subsequent ownership or renaming records or look for county deed filings and contractor disclosures that would signal a reopening under a different name; current reporting does not provide those details (available sources do not mention county deed transfers or renaming).