Glenda Fairbach was a singer in the 1960s who released dirty songs
Executive summary
Available sources indicate "Glenda Fairbach" is presented online as a 1950s–60s singer of explicit novelty songs, with tracks posted by accounts such as Banned Vinyl that claim a 1959 self-release (e.g., "My Ass Is Big Enough For Both Of You") [1]. Independent investigations and forum reporting identify Glenda Fairbach as a likely fictional persona or modern fabrication rather than a documented historical artist [2] [3].
1. The viral claim: a 1959 naughty novelty singer
Online music-collector sites and niche outlets host recordings attributed to Glenda Fairbach and list provocative titles and release claims; for example, Bandcamp’s Banned Vinyl page posts "My Ass Is Big Enough For Both Of You" with a stated release date of 08 August 1959 and a note that the record was self-released and sold over 10,000 copies [1]. A mirrored upload on Odysee repeats the narrative that a 1959 single financed a Florida cabin and other backstory details [4]. These postings present a tidy origin story typical of retro-collector lore: self-released vinyl, regional sales, and taboo content that would have kept tracks off radio [1].
2. Fact-checkers and forums: the persona flagged as fiction
Multiple contemporary fact-check threads and a TruthOrFake blog entry conclude the "Glenda Fairbach" identity is likely fictional. TruthOrFake’s analysis rules the claim false and attributes the persona to a creator using the pseudonym Jon Andre Lundal, arguing the name and biography were fabricated rather than documented in period sources [2]. A digital radio forum mirrors that assessment, warning readers to "trust nothing on the internet" and calling Fairbach a fictional character created by an online user [3]. These sources present the strongest available counter-evidence to the historical-artist narrative.
3. Evidence gaps: what the sources do not show
Available sources do not include contemporaneous documents—label catalogs, chart listings, newspaper reviews, or music-industry databases—confirming a real 1959 commercial release by a Glenda Fairbach; fact-checkers point to this absence as central to their verdict [2]. The Banned Vinyl uploads and Odysee posts make claims about sales figures and biographical specifics, but those claims are not corroborated by independent archival references in the provided material [1] [4]. In short, primary archival evidence from the 1950s–60s is not found in current reporting.
4. Modern production clues and creator admission claims
The Banned Vinyl entry contains language that signals modern production techniques—remarks that the songs are "made using emerging music technologies and careful work in Photoshop"—which aligns with the claim that the recordings or their packaging may be contemporary fabrications styled as vintage [1]. Forum and fact-check posts openly assign authorship of the fictional backstory to an online creator using a pseudonym, indicating a deliberate attempt to craft a retro persona rather than a discovery of genuine period artifacts [3] [2].
5. Alternative explanations and competing perspectives
One reading treats the Baned Vinyl/Bandcamp material as artistic retro-novelty work or an internet-era hoax masquerading as rare vinyl; the posts themselves blur lines by offering musical tracks while simultaneously narrating a vintage biography [1]. Fact-checkers and forum participants interpret the same evidence as fabrication. Both perspectives rely on the same sources: the archival silence about a 1960s singer and the explicit statements on the uploads about modern production. The debate centers on whether the postings are playful artifice or deliberate misinformation [2] [1].
6. What a reader should take away
Given the lack of independent, contemporaneous documentation and the presence of admissions or strong indications of modern creation, the most defensible conclusion from available reporting is that "Glenda Fairbach" functions as a fictional or fabricated persona rather than a verifiable 1960s recording artist [2] [3]. Sources that promote the songs exist and host tracks labeled as 1959 releases, but those same sources include signals that undermine historical authenticity [1] [4]. For a definitive historical claim, primary archival evidence—label rosters, contemporaneous press, or verified physical-pressing provenance—is not found in current reporting [2].
Limitations: this analysis uses only the provided sources and does not include searches beyond them; other archival materials may exist but are not cited here.