Which explicit or 'dirty' songs did glenda fairbach release in the 1960s?
Executive summary
Available reporting indicates "Glenda Fairbach" is a likely fictional persona associated with novelty or adult-themed recordings and online fabrications; several obscene song titles (for example "My Ass Is Big Enough For Both Of You" and other X-rated titles) are attributed to that persona in online posts and a fact-checking blog [1] [2]. Sources describe these songs as circulated in thread posts and a blog rather than documented commercial releases from the 1960s; investigations cited by those sources conclude the character is not a verified historical recording artist [1] [2].
1. The claim: obscene 1950s–60s songs attributed to Glenda Fairbach
Forum posts and blog summaries list explicit titles reportedly tied to "Glenda Fairbach," including "Summer Night Sodomy," "The First Time In My Rectum," "I Still Remember The Day You Came In My Ass," "I Want Two Guys In My Ass" and "My Ass Is Big Enough For Both Of You" [1]. Those listings appear in user-generated threads where contributors recount alleged 1950s–1960s erotic or novelty vinyl records and share outrage, humor and skepticism [1].
2. The provenance problem: forum posts, not archival records
The main public traces in the provided reporting are a Digital Radio Central forum thread and a TruthOrFake blog post that analyze internet claims; neither source presents cataloged record-collection evidence, label scans, or library/archive listings proving formal commercial releases by a historical artist named Glenda Fairbach [1] [2]. The forum itself cautions readers—"Trust nothing on the internet"—highlighting the weak documentary basis for treating the titles as validated 1960s releases [1].
3. Fact-checkers and the fictional-persona conclusion
TruthOrFake’s writeup concludes that Glenda Fairbach is most likely a fictional character created by someone using the name Jon Andre Lundal and that the pornographic song attributions function as a persona within a niche of "Banned Vinyl" lore rather than a real midcentury singer with verifiable discography [2]. That blog emphasizes that the existence of lurid titles circulating online does not equate to archival proof of real-world releases [2].
4. Two plausible interpretations from the available evidence
One interpretation, reflected in the forum posts, is that these titles are part of an oral/online folklore around obscene novelty records: people recount or joke about such songs as if they were 1950s–60s artifacts [1]. The competing interpretation, advanced by the fact-check blog, is that the persona and songs are modern fabrications or creative inventions attached retroactively to a false biography, possibly amplified by AI-generated or social-media content [2].
5. What the current sources do not show
Available sources do not include primary-document evidence (label catalog entries, matrix numbers, record-collector references, library holdings, contemporary advertisements, or credible discographies) confirming that these explicit titles were commercially released in the 1960s under the name Glenda Fairbach [1] [2]. The sources also do not provide interviews with record collectors or archivists who confirm physical copies [1] [2].
6. Why this matters: folklore, misinformation and niche erotica collecting
The story illustrates how niche humor, internet forums, and persona creation can congeal into widely repeated "facts" that lack archival grounding; the Digital Radio Central thread reproduces lurid titles while TruthOrFake frames the tale as likely fictional invention [1] [2]. For researchers, collectors or journalists seeking to verify claims about historic recordings, the absence of cataloged evidence and the explicit assertion by a fact-checker that Glenda Fairbach is probably a constructed character are decisive reasons to treat the song attributions as unverified.
7. Next, if you want proof: where to look
The provided sources do not offer concrete follow-up leads such as catalog numbers or archive holdings to prove or disprove commercial releases [1] [2]. To verify further you would need to consult primary sources not included here: physical record-collector catalogs, national library sound archives, established discographies of banned/vintage erotica records, or authenticated copies surfaced by reputable collectors.
Limitations: This analysis relies solely on the two provided reports—a user forum thread and a fact-check blog—and follows their conclusions and caveats. Both pieces conclude the persona and song attributions lack reliable archival documentation [1] [2].