Greg McKeon gay porn star penis size

Checked on January 21, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Most fan and pornographic databases that profile Greg McKeon attribute a very large penis to him—commonly an 8‑inch measurement on aggregation sites [1]—and other directories label him “extra‑large” [2], but these claims come from fan/industry listings and publicity materials rather than independent, verifiable measurement; contradictory commentary about his anatomy also exists on gossip blogs and forum threads [3] [4].

1. The prevailing claim: 8 inches and “extra‑large”

The clearest, repeatable figure appearing in the collected reportage is an 8‑inch listing for Greg McKeon’s “dick size,” as shown on a specialist porn performer profile page [1], while another adult database characterizes his member simply as “Extra‑Large” and notes he is circumcised [2]; multiple fan and archive sites that track his scenes and scenes’ thumbnails routinely reference his genital footage or emphasize a prominent bulge in imagery [5] [6] [7].

2. Source types and how they arrive at a number

Every source that supplies a precise size is an industry fan site or performer directory—outlets that aggregate scene screenshots, promotional stills, and sometimes performer self‑reports or studio copy—rather than neutral third‑party measurements; the 8‑inch number appears as a data field on MyGayPornStarList [1] and the “extra‑large” tag is a categorical label on NakedGuysInMovies [2], which reflects classification and audience perception more than clinical verification.

3. Conflicting commentary and the limits of photographic evidence

Not all commentary aligns: a blog post that highlighted jockstrap photos of McKeon included a reader quip calling it “the smallest penis i’ve ever seen,” revealing that visual impressions vary widely across viewers and image selection [3], and forum chatter ranges from dismissive to laudatory about his looks and equipment [4]; photographic close‑ups, camera angles, and post‑production framing used in erotic media can exaggerate or minimize perceived size, meaning stills and clips—while indicative of prominence—cannot substitute for a verifiable measurement [6] [8].

4. Context from career coverage: why anatomy becomes a data point

Greg McKeon’s profile is documented across industry tracking sites and blogs because his work—ranging from studio scenes on labels like MissionaryBoys and FamilyDick to self‑produced content—often foregrounds explicit nudity and close‑ups, which encourages cataloguers to list physical attributes such as “dick size” as part of performer metadata [9] [5] [10]; databases like the Internet Adult Film Database host filmographies for performers but do not independently verify anatomical dimensions [11].

5. Bottom line: the most reported figure, with a health warning about verification

The most consistent, repeatable claim among the provided sources is that Greg McKeon’s penis is 8 inches or “extra‑large” [1] [2], but that claim rests on fan‑driven performer directories and promotional material rather than an objective, documented measurement; available reporting shows both enthusiastic amplification and skeptical dismissal [3] [4], so any firm assertion about exact size should be qualified as unverified outside these industry and fan listings.

Want to dive deeper?
How reliable are size listings on porn performer directories and how are they sourced?
What photographic techniques do adult studios use to exaggerate or minimize performers’ anatomy in scenes?
Which reputable databases document adult filmographies and what verification standards do they use?