Has Harry filed for divorce from Meghan?

Checked on February 3, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

There is no credible reporting in the provided sources that Prince Harry has filed for divorce from Meghan Markle; what exists are a cluster of tabloid pieces predicting a potential split and citing unnamed “insiders” about tensions over a possible return to the U.K.[1] [2]. Established fact-checking coverage from earlier years underscores that specific claims of divorce filings have previously lacked evidence [3].

1. What the recent stories actually say — predictions, not filings

Multiple outlets led by RadarOnline and republished by SheKnows, AOL, Inquisitr and others describe a heated argument and deep disagreement between the couple over Harry’s desire to return to Britain and suggest that this could “see them finally file for divorce this year,” but those reports are framed as insider speculation rather than documentation of legal action or a court filing [1] [2] [4].

2. The absence of any reported legal filing in these pieces

None of the articles in the search results present a court document, a lawyer’s statement, or any direct confirmation from Harry or Meghan that divorce papers have been filed; the cores of these stories are sourced to anonymous “one source” quotes warning the dispute could become a breaking point [5] [6]. Past fact-checking of similar rumors found no credible evidence when specific filing claims circulated, reinforcing that gossip can outpace verifiable legal steps [3].

3. Where the coverage comes from and why that matters

The primary narratives here trace to RadarOnline and tabloid syndication (seen on SheKnows, AOL, Inquisitr and other outlets), publications that frequently rely on unnamed insiders and sensational framing to drive traffic, which creates an incentive to amplify worst-case scenarios about celebrity relationships [1] [2] [4]. Those outlets’ business models and editorial histories are relevant context when assessing the difference between “could” and “has.”

4. Counterpoints and public statements — thin on direct rebuttal

The supplied files include examples of outlets and items pushing the “headed for divorce” line and a Radar piece promising a “most brutal fight yet,” but they also contain mentions that sources close to the couple have at times “set the record straight” denying immediate plans for divorce [7]. Importantly, the materials do not include a contemporaneous statement from either Prince Harry or Meghan confirming any filing or intent to file, which leaves the claim unverified [7].

5. Historical pattern of rumor and fact-checking

This couple has been the subject of recurring divorce rumors for years; independent fact-checkers have previously debunked specific viral claims about filings and monetary demands—illustrating a pattern in which unverified social-media claims and tabloid conjecture circulate until disproven or forgotten [3]. The present batch of 2026 stories fits that pattern: alarming headlines built on anonymous sourcing rather than primary legal evidence.

6. What can be concluded right now

Based on the provided reporting, the accurate answer is: no, there is no documented evidence that Harry has filed for divorce from Meghan; the coverage consists of insider-sourced speculation about a possible future filing tied to disputes over a U.K. return [1] [2]. The claim that a filing has already occurred is not supported by the materials supplied, and earlier fact-checks caution against accepting similar rumors without primary documentation [3].

7. Why readers should care about the sourcing and incentives

These stories are emblematic of a media ecology where anonymous insiders and sensational predictions can become de facto “news” despite lacking verifiable legal filings; readers should weigh the outlets’ tendencies to republish and amplify a single tabloids’ anonymous claims before treating “could file” as equivalent to “has filed” [1] [2]. Where possible, verification would require a court filing, a lawyer’s statement, or a direct comment from the parties—none of which appears in the provided reporting.

Want to dive deeper?
What official signs or documents confirm a divorce filing in California or the U.K. and how can journalists verify them?
How have RadarOnline and similar tabloids historically sourced ‘insider’ claims about the royal family, and what is their accuracy record?
What public statements have Harry and Meghan made about past divorce rumors, and how have fact-checkers treated those rumors?