Fact check: Casting Joel Edgerton as the Pharoah in Exodus: Gods and Kings was racist white-washing. Casting Nathanial Harris to portray Sir Isaac Newton in an episode of Doctor Who is considered progressive.

1. Summary of the results

The situation presents a complex discussion about racial representation in media. The casting of Joel Edgerton as Ramses II in Exodus involved artificially darkening a "blue-eyed blond from Blacktown" to play an Egyptian pharaoh ^[1]. This decision faced significant criticism and was labeled as "cinematic colonialism" ^[2]. Meanwhile, contemporary casting practices increasingly support diversity and representation in traditionally white roles, as evidenced by broader industry trends ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

• Financial Justification: Director Ridley Scott explicitly defended the Exodus casting decision on financial grounds, claiming the film couldn't be financed with a non-white lead actor ^[2]. This reveals systemic industry issues beyond simple casting choices.
• Broader Pattern: The Exodus casting controversy wasn't just about the lead role - black actors were systematically relegated to minor roles as "servants, assassins, and thieves" ^[2].
• Industry Evolution: Current casting practices are increasingly focused on expanding narratives and challenging traditional representations ^[3], with evidence suggesting that diverse casts help challenge stereotypes and shape audience perceptions ^[4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents a false equivalency by comparing two different casting scenarios without acknowledging:

• Historical Context: The statement ignores the long history of whitewashing in Hollywood, where white actors frequently played characters of color while actors of color had limited opportunities.
• Power Dynamics: The statement overlooks how diverse casting in traditionally white roles serves to challenge historical underrepresentation ^[3], while whitewashing perpetuates existing power imbalances.
• Industry Benefits: Different groups benefit from these casting decisions:
• Traditional studios benefit financially from casting established white actors ^[2]
• Marginalized communities benefit from increased representation and narrative control ^[4]
• Production companies benefit from positive public reception to inclusive casting practices ^[3]