Which notable models and talent were represented by IDT Models and where are they now?

1. What the records we have actually show: multiple “IDT” organizations, not a modeling agency

The documents in your search results describe several distinct companies that share the “IDT” initials: Integrated DNA Technologies (a genomics/oligonucleotide company) ^[1], IDT Corporation (a communications and payments company) ^{[2] [4]}, and IDT Global / Integrated Document Technologies pages that focus on telecoms or document services ^{[3] [5]}. None of those pages present a talent-management or fashion-modeling roster; each source focuses on its own sector—biotech, telecom/payments, or document/IDP services—rather than talent representation ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. Why the absence matters for your original question

Journalistically, absence of evidence in these specific sources means we cannot reliably answer “which notable models and talent were represented by IDT Models and where are they now” from this material. The supplied pages provide corporate histories, leadership, product partnerships and contact info for biotech and communications businesses, but they do not list models, talent, or agency alumni—so any claim about an “IDT Models” roster would be unsupported by the current set of sources ^{[1] [6] [7]}.

3. Potential sources you might pursue next (and why they matter)

To answer your original query, you should look for industry-specific records that are absent here: archived fashion-industry press, modeling agency registries, trade publications (e.g., Models.com, Business of Fashion), or news archives naming an “IDT Models” agency and its clients. The pages in your results that do exist—company About pages, leadership bios, and product/partnership announcements—are useful for corporate context but do not substitute for modeling-industry sources ^{[3] [6] [8]}.

4. Alternative explanations for the confusion

There are plausible reasons you found these unrelated IDT pages: many firms use the acronym “IDT” (Integrated DNA Technologies, IDT Corporation, Integrated Document Technologies), and simple web searches can surface multiple IDs across sectors. That could create the impression of a single entity when there are multiple unrelated organizations ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The available results illustrate exactly that ambiguity: biotech, telecom, and document-tech uses of “IDT” appear in the set we were given ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

5. How I treated the sources and limits of this report

I used only the supplied search results and cited each factual assertion to those results. Because none of the supplied pages mention a modeling agency or list model talent, I avoided inventing or extrapolating any roster or “where they are now” updates. If you have an alternate source—an article, archive link, or even a different search string (for example, “IDT Models agency roster,” “IDT Model Management,” or specific model names you suspect were represented)—I can re-check and synthesize those materials into a roster and status update. The current reporting simply does not contain the information your original query asks for ^{[1] [3] [2]}.

6. Recommended next steps for you (practical search tips)

Search fashion-industry databases and archives (Models.com, Fashion Model Directory), check trade press archives (Vogue Business, Business of Fashion), or provide any alternate URLs or screenshots you might already have. If the agency name might be slightly different (e.g., “ID Models,” “IDT Model Management”), try those variants; the corporate pages we have won’t appear in such sources because they focus on biotech, telecom, or document services ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

If you’d like, give me a new search term or upload an article or screenshot that explicitly references “IDT Models” and I will analyze it and produce a sourced summary of notable talent and current status.