Is it funny?

1. What the curators say: lots of content labeled “funny”

Sites that collect memes and images frame November’s output as comedic and shareable: BroBible posted “50 Of The Best Memes Of November (So Far)” and promises regular updates of the “funniest memes on the Internet,” signaling editorial confidence that much of the content will land as humorous for their audience ^[1]. Pleated Jeans ran lists titled “35 Funniest Pictures From This Month — So Far” and “30 Hilarious And Weirdly Specific Tweets,” again curating material explicitly labeled funny and implying audience enjoyment ^{[2] [4]}. Those editorial decisions indicate supply — many creators and aggregators think the material is funny ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Humor is curated, not universal — editorial voice matters

These sites select items that fit their tone and readers: Cheezburger/Memebase compile “Freshest and Funniest Tweets of the Week,” a format that presumes comedy but is shaped by the site’s taste and cultural references ^{[3] [5] [6]}. Memedroid’s blog markets “the best November 2025 memes” with seasonal framing and recommended tags, showing that “funny” is filtered through platform culture and topical hooks like holidays ^[7]. In short, curators tell you they found things funny; that’s persuasive for their audience but not an empirical measure ^{[3] [7]}.

3. Variety of joke types: observational, surreal, seasonal

The pieces collected cover different comedic modes: observational tweets and odd specifics (Pleated Jeans’ “weirdly specific tweets”), image-based visual gags (OddStuffMagazine’s daily funny pictures), and seasonal contrast jokes (ThunderDungeon’s beginning-of-November memes mixing Halloween and early holiday motifs) ^{[4] [8] [9]}. This variety increases chances an individual will find something funny because different audiences respond to different comedic mechanisms ^{[4] [9]}.

4. Frequency and momentum: weekly and monthly scaffolding

Multiple outlets publish weekly or rolling lists (Cheezburger’s week-by-week tweet roundups, BroBible’s monthly 50 list, Pleated Jeans’ periodic collections), which creates momentum: recurring features normalize the idea that new content will be funny and worth checking frequently ^{[3] [1] [2]}. That editorial cadence encourages sharing and collective judgment about what “is funny” in real time ^{[3] [1]}.

5. Audience signals — implied, not quantified

These pages implicitly argue for humor through curation and tone, but the provided sources don’t give audience metrics, surveys, or objective ratings to prove universal funniness — they are selections meant to entertain a particular readership ^{[1] [2] [7]}. For measurable claims like “most people found X funny,” the available reporting does not provide numbers or polls — that data is not found in current reporting ^{[1] [2]}.

6. Practical takeaway: how to decide if it’s funny for you

If you want to test whether November’s material is funny to you, sample across formats and curators: look at BroBible’s 50-meme roundup for mainstream meme culture, Pleated Jeans for witty image/tweet collections, and Cheezburger for topical tweet humor — each targets slightly different tastes ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Because humor is subjective, breadth of exposure increases odds you’ll find things that land.

Limitations and caveats: these sources are editorial roundups and meme aggregators; they claim and curate humor but do not present independent measures of audience reaction ^{[1] [2] [3]}. If you want empirical evidence (view counts, engagement metrics, or representative polling), available sources do not mention those data points.