What did contestants like Jessica Ciarlo and Alicia Machado allege about inappropriate behavior at Trump pageant events?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Alicia Machado has long alleged that, while Miss Universe in 1996, she was publicly humiliated and fat‑shamed by Donald Trump — including being called “Miss Piggy” and “Miss Housekeeping,” paraded to exercise in front of cameras and put on a strict Mar‑a‑Lago fitness regimen — and later says those events contributed to eating‑disorder struggles [1] [2] [3] [4]. Other former pageant contestants have separately alleged that Trump sometimes entered dressing rooms while contestants were undressing, a practice he himself has spoken about in interviews; those claims are reported alongside multiple accounts and corporate responses in contemporary reporting [5] [6].
1. Alicia Machado: weight‑shaming, public humiliation and a regimented fitness program
Machado says that after winning Miss Universe in 1996 she gained weight and was publicly castigated by the pageant’s owner, Donald Trump, who called her names including “Miss Piggy” and “Miss Housekeeping,” then organized highly publicized weight‑loss measures — a 1,200‑calorie diet and daily exercise at Mar‑a‑Lago with cameras present — which she says humiliated her and worsened disordered eating [1] [2] [3] [4].
2. Allegations of sexual advances and attempted contact: contested claims
Some reporting has relayed Machado’s later statements that Trump made sexual advances or attempts at contact while she was young in the pageant world; outlets such as Newsweek summarized her claims that he “repeatedly tried to have sex” with her while also publicly shaming her, though Machado has also said she never had sexual relations with him and the details have been treated differently across outlets [7] [2].
3. Broader contestant reports: dressing‑room entries and organizational culture
Beyond Machado, multiple former Miss USA and Miss Teen USA contestants told journalists that Trump entered dressing rooms while contestants were partially undressed, and Trump himself described such access in a 2005 interview, creating a pattern of contemporaneous and retrospective allegations about intrusive behavior at pageant events [5] [6]. These accounts were gathered and reported by news organizations and compiled in broader timelines of allegations [5] [6].
4. The media spectacle and campaign weaponization
Machado’s story was resurrected and amplified during the 2016 presidential campaign when Hillary Clinton cited Trump’s treatment of Machado as an example of misogyny, after which Trump publicly accused Machado of having a “sex tape” and otherwise attacked her character — claims the press described as based on internet rumors and unproven assertions [8] [9] [10]. The coverage shows how private allegations about pageant treatment became political ammunition and a media spectacle [2] [11].
5. Responses, denials and the record’s limits
Trump and his allies have disputed or dismissed many of these accounts, and reporting shows he later doubled down on insulting Machado while also telling journalists “quiet piggy” in a separate incident decades later, demonstrating conflicting narratives and ongoing public back‑and‑forth [12] [2]. At the same time, some pageant staff have vouched for different aspects of their experience working with him, producing a mixed record that journalists have had to reconcile [5].
6. What the provided reporting does not show: Jessica Ciarlo and evidentiary gaps
The materials supplied for this analysis contain extensive coverage of Machado and aggregated allegations by other contestants, but include no reporting or source material about a contestant named Jessica Ciarlo; therefore no factual claim about what Ciarlo allegedly said can be substantiated from these sources, and that absence is a limitation of the record reviewed here (p1_s1–[3]5). Where Machado’s accounts are recorded, some specific claims (for example, allegations of sexual contact or a “sex tape”) were reported differently across outlets and remain contested or unproven in the cited reporting [7] [10].