Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Has Jimmy Kimmel ever considered leaving ABC for another network?
Executive Summary
Jimmy Kimmel has been the subject of conflicting reports in September–October 2025 about whether he is actively trying to leave ABC for another network; some outlets quote insiders saying he wants out after his show's suspension, while other reporting describes negotiations to keep him on ABC and plans for his return [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. These accounts reflect two competing narratives—an insurgent narrative of departure fueled by angry insiders and staff pessimism, and an institutional narrative of compromise and retention—each supported by different sources and motives in the coverage [1] [4] [6].
1. Why the “Kimmel is leaving ABC” story gained traction fast
Several September 2025 pieces present direct claims that Kimmel wants to sever ties with ABC after a suspension tied to comments about Charlie Kirk, including quotes that he is “looking to get ‘out of his contract’” and “absolutely f***ing livid,” and staffers saying they “can’t imagine a scenario” in which the show returns [1] [2] [3]. Those stories rely on anonymous or unattributed insiders and amplify the emotional tenor inside the show’s ranks, creating a compelling narrative of rupture; the reporting emphasizes personal anger and immediate planning for appearances elsewhere, a framing that supports the claim of an imminent exit even though it stops short of documenting any signed deals or formal overtures to other networks [1] [2].
2. Why the “Kimmel staying, negotiating” counter-narrative is equally visible
Contemporaneous reporting dated later in September portrays a different outcome: Kimmel and Disney negotiating terms for a return to ABC, with the host reportedly weighing the job security of staff and planning a comeback without an apology for the remarks in question, suggesting reconciliation rather than a move to another network [4] [5]. These articles frame the situation as corporate damage control and labor concern—Disney and ABC seeking compromise to preserve the production and its employees—producing a competing claim that there is no evidence Kimmel seeks to sign with another network at this time [4] [5].
3. Affiliates, mergers and the larger context that complicates the story
Separate analysis focuses on affiliate decisions and broadcaster strategies—not Kimmel’s personal contractual intentions—highlighting Nexstar and Sinclair pulling the show from some ABC stations amid corporate strategy tied to a Tegna merger and FCC positioning [6] [7] [8]. Those pieces underscore that removal from affiliates can be driven by station-group calculus rather than a host’s network choice, meaning the observable outcome (the show’s absence in markets) can be misread as the host abandoning ABC when the real drivers may be external corporate and regulatory incentives [6] [7].
4. Assessing the evidentiary weight: insiders versus institutional documents
The “Kimmel leaving” claims rest heavily on anonymous insider quotes and staff sentiment, which provide immediacy but limited verifiability; none of the analyses supplied here cite a contract termination, a signed deal with another network, or on-the-record executive confirmation of Kimmel’s intent to depart [1] [2] [3]. By contrast, reporting about negotiations and a planned return involves named entities—Disney and ABC—framing decisions in organizational terms and referencing discussions about staff impacts, which are consistent with a negotiated remediation rather than an outright split [4] [5]. This contrast matters for certainty.
5. Motives and possible agendas shaping the coverage
Coverage that foregrounds insider rage and an imminent jump to another show benefits from sensationalism and the drama of a top host defecting, while reporting emphasizing corporate compromise favors institutional stability and protects business interests tied to ABC and Disney [2] [4]. Meanwhile, affiliate-focused pieces may reflect station-group incentives to distance local markets from controversy as leverage in broader mergers, a motive separate from any actor’s desire to change employers [7] [8]. Each framing serves different audiences—tabloid-style breakaway narratives, corporate damage-control narratives, and regulatory/affiliate strategy narratives respectively.
6. Bottom line: what the assembled evidence actually establishes
From the documents provided here, the only firmly supported facts are that Kimmel’s show was suspended amid controversy, that some insiders expressed anger and pessimism about the show’s future, and that Disney/ABC engaged in negotiations about the program’s status and employees [1] [3] [4]. There is no verifiable, on-record evidence in these analyses that Kimmel has formally sought or accepted a role at another network; claims that he is “planning” appearances or “wants out” remain uncorroborated assertions from anonymous sources [2] [1] [5].
7. What to watch next to resolve the question definitively
To confirm whether Kimmel is actually trying to leave ABC for another network requires verifiable signals: a contract termination notice, public statements by Kimmel, ABC, or a competing network announcing negotiations or hires, or filings and affiliate carriage agreements reflecting a transfer. In the absence of such documentation in the supplied reporting, the prudent conclusion is that the story remains disputed: insider-fueled reports claim departure plans while institutional reporting documents active negotiations to keep the show at ABC—neither side delivers definitive proof of a network switch as of the most recent analyses provided [1] [4] [6].