People don’t find Jimmy Kimmel funny anymore
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The available evidence strongly contradicts the claim that people don't find Jimmy Kimmel funny anymore. Multiple sources report that Jimmy Kimmel's return to late-night television after a brief suspension achieved record-breaking viewership numbers. His comeback episode drew 6.26 million total viewers, making it the show's highest-performing regularly scheduled episode in over a decade [1] [2]. This represents his largest television audience in more than a decade [3].
The impressive ratings extend beyond traditional television metrics. Kimmel's content reached over 20 million views on YouTube and social media platforms [3], while his monologue about free speech in America has reached tens of millions of people across ABC, YouTube, and social media platforms, with view counts still rising [4]. This multi-platform success demonstrates that audiences are actively seeking out and engaging with his content across various formats.
Traditional late-night television ratings have experienced overall decline, but this trend affects the entire genre rather than being specific to Kimmel [5]. Despite this industry-wide challenge, late-night shows maintain significant online presence with millions of YouTube subscribers and views, suggesting that people still find Jimmy Kimmel funny, just in different formats [5].
The sources also reveal that Kimmel's return featured an emotional monologue where he addressed his suspension and expressed gratitude for support from across the political spectrum, indicating he maintains a significant and engaged audience who find him funny and relevant [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement lacks crucial context about the recent controversy and suspension that preceded Kimmel's return. Sources indicate that Kimmel faced backlash over comments about Charlie Kirk and experienced divided reactions to his comedy and political commentary [7]. This controversy appears to have been a significant factor in driving viewership for his return, as audiences were curious about how he would address the situation.
The statement also ignores the evolving landscape of comedy consumption. While traditional broadcast ratings may fluctuate, the comedy industry has shifted significantly toward digital platforms where Kimmel maintains strong performance metrics [5] [4]. This represents a fundamental change in how audiences consume late-night content rather than a decline in Kimmel's comedic appeal.
Political polarization emerges as another missing element. Sources reveal that Kimmel addressed attacks from President Donald Trump and described the president as an '80s-movie-style bully' during his return [8]. This political commentary has created complexities in navigating public opinion and the evolving nature of what is considered acceptable in comedy and media [9]. The controversy surrounding his past use of blackface and controversial jokes adds additional layers to public perception [9].
The statement fails to acknowledge that comedy has become the original battleground for cancel culture, with Kimmel representing a significant case study in how comedians navigate controversy [7]. This broader cultural context is essential for understanding current audience dynamics.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement appears to contain significant misinformation by presenting a definitive claim without supporting evidence. The assertion directly contradicts measurable data showing record-breaking viewership and engagement across multiple platforms [1] [2] [3] [4].
The statement may reflect selective interpretation of data, potentially focusing on isolated negative reactions or specific demographic segments while ignoring broader audience metrics. The timing of this claim is particularly suspect given that Kimmel just achieved his highest ratings in over a decade [2] [3].
There's potential political bias in the statement, as it coincides with Kimmel's increased political commentary and conflicts with political figures [8]. The claim may represent an attempt to diminish his influence during a period when his political content is generating significant attention and engagement.
The statement also demonstrates format bias by potentially focusing only on traditional television metrics while ignoring digital platform success where millions continue to engage with his content [5] [4]. This narrow focus misrepresents the complete picture of his current audience reach and engagement levels.