What did Jimmy Kimmel say to get postponed indefinately?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that Jimmy Kimmel's show was suspended indefinitely due to his comments about Charlie Kirk's death and the reaction of the "Maga gang" to it [1] [2] [3]. Specifically, Kimmel stated that the "Maga gang" was "desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them" and trying to "score political points from it" [1] [2] [3]. The suspension was reportedly a result of backlash from the FCC chair, ABC affiliates, and other groups [2] [4]. Some sources also mention that Kimmel criticized Trump's response to the assassination, saying it was "not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend" [5]. Additionally, Kimmel compared Trump's reaction to "how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish", which was deemed ill-timed and insensitive by Disney [6]. The suspension has been lifted, and Kimmel's show is set to return to the air [2] [7].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some key points that are missing from the original statement include:
- The reaction of various individuals and groups to Kimmel's comments, such as the FCC chair, ABC affiliates, and other celebrities [3].
- The demands made by Sinclair, the largest ABC affiliate group, for Kimmel to apologize and donate to Charlie Kirk's family and nonprofit organization, Turning Point USA [8].
- The potential consequences of Kimmel's return to the air, including the possibility of him apologizing for his comments or doubling down on his criticism of those responsible for the suspension [9].
- Alternative viewpoints on the suspension, such as the perspective of Turning Point USA, which has called Disney's decision to allow Kimmel to return a "mistake" [9].
- The financial implications of the suspension, including the cost to Disney [4].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement does not provide any context or quotes from Kimmel's comments, which could lead to misinterpretation or misinformation [1] [2] [3]. The statement also does not mention the reaction of various individuals and groups to Kimmel's comments, which could be seen as biased [3]. Additionally, the statement does not provide any information about the potential consequences of Kimmel's return to the air, which could be seen as omitting relevant context [9]. It is also worth noting that some sources may have a bias in their reporting, such as sources with a conservative or liberal perspective [7] [4] [5]. Ultimately, it is crucial to consider multiple sources and viewpoints when evaluating the situation [1] [2] [3] [7] [4] [5] [6] [8] [9].