How have Jimmy Kimmel's ratings changed since his show's debut in 2003?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Jimmy Kimmel Live! experienced a dramatic ratings surge following Kimmel's return from a production hiatus/suspension in September 2025. The show achieved 6.26 million viewers for his return episode on September 23, which represents the largest audience ever for a regular episode in the show's 22-year history [1] [2]. This viewership milestone is particularly significant as it occurred despite the show not airing on affiliates owned by Nexstar Media or Sinclair Broadcast Group, meaning it was preempted in over 20% of households nationwide [3].
The demographic performance was equally impressive, with the return episode earning a 0.87 rating among adults 18-49, marking the show's best performance in that key demographic for a regularly scheduled episode in more than a decade [2]. This achievement is noteworthy as Kimmel currently leads among the three major broadcast TV late-night shows in the 18-49 demographic [3].
To contextualize this surge, the analyses reveal that a typical Jimmy Kimmel Live! episode attracts approximately 1.6 million viewers [4], making the 6.26 million viewer count more than three times higher than the show's average for the second quarter of 2025 [2]. This represents not just a temporary spike but the show's highest-performing regularly scheduled episode in over a decade [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question asks about ratings changes since the show's 2003 debut, but the analyses provided focus exclusively on recent events from September 2025, creating a significant 22-year gap in historical context. The sources don't provide comprehensive data showing the show's ratings trajectory over its entire run, including peak periods, declining phases, or competitive positioning against other late-night hosts throughout different eras.
Critical missing information includes the show's initial ratings performance in 2003, how it fared during major cultural moments, competition from other late-night hosts like Jay Leno, David Letterman, Conan O'Brien, and Stephen Colbert over the years, and whether there were previous ratings peaks that might contextualize the current "record" claims. The analyses mention that this surge "mirrors that of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert after its announced ending" [5], suggesting that controversy or major events can drive viewership spikes, but don't explore this pattern historically.
Additionally, the sources don't address long-term sustainability of these ratings or whether this represents a genuine resurgence or merely a temporary curiosity-driven spike. The analyses also lack information about how streaming, cord-cutting, and changing media consumption habits have affected late-night television ratings industry-wide since 2003.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself doesn't contain explicit misinformation, but it implies a request for comprehensive historical analysis that the provided sources cannot fulfill. The question suggests an expectation of longitudinal data spanning over two decades, while the analyses only cover a single recent event.
However, there's potential for misleading interpretation in how the "record" ratings are framed. While the sources consistently report this as the show's "biggest audience ever" for a regular episode [1] [2], this claim requires careful qualification. The television landscape of 2003 was vastly different from 2025, with different measurement methodologies, viewing habits, and competitive environments. A "record" in 2025 might not represent the same cultural impact or relative success as ratings from earlier decades when television viewership patterns were fundamentally different.
The sources also don't address whether these ratings include streaming or delayed viewing, which could affect historical comparisons. Additionally, the emphasis on this being a "regular episode" record [2] suggests there may have been special episodes or events that drew larger audiences, but this distinction isn't explored.
The timing coincidence of multiple sources reporting identical viewership figures (6.26 million) without providing broader context about the show's historical performance suggests these analyses may be responding to a specific news cycle rather than providing comprehensive ratings analysis, potentially creating an incomplete picture of the show's long-term trajectory.