Respond to the claim that ABC (without influence from Trump) cancelled Jimmy Kimmel for "horrible ratings and bad decisions"
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The claim that ABC cancelled Jimmy Kimmel's show due to "horrible ratings and bad decisions" without influence from Trump is not supported by the majority of the analyses provided [1] [2] [3]. These sources suggest that the cancellation was influenced by Trump, with the FCC Chair Brendan Carr playing a significant role in the decision [2] [3]. Other analyses indicate that the show's ratings and viewership had been declining over the past decade, with a 37% decline in total viewers and a 72% decline in the key demographic of adults 25-54 [4]. However, these sources also mention that the decision to suspend Kimmel's show was likely due to a combination of factors, including his comments on Charlie Kirk's death and the subsequent backlash [5] [6]. Additionally, some sources suggest that Kimmel's contract was set to expire in May 2026, and that Disney and ABC are working towards a compromise to bring the show back on air [7] [8].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the complexity of the situation, with multiple factors contributing to the cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel's show [1] [5] [7]. Alternative viewpoints include the idea that the cancellation was not solely due to ratings or content quality, but also due to political influence [2] [3] and the backlash from affiliated broadcasters and the FCC [1]. Some sources also highlight the decline of late-night TV shows in general, which could be a factor in the decision to suspend Kimmel's show [5]. Furthermore, the fact that Kimmel's crew is being paid despite the show's indefinite suspension suggests that the situation is more nuanced than a simple cancellation [9]. Key stakeholders who benefit from each viewpoint include:
- ABC and Disney, who may benefit from a more nuanced understanding of the situation and a potential compromise to bring the show back on air [8]
- Jimmy Kimmel, who may benefit from a more accurate understanding of the reasons behind the cancellation and a potential path forward for his show [7]
- Conservative activists, who may benefit from a narrative that emphasizes the role of political influence in the cancellation of Kimmel's show [2] [3]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading in its claim that ABC cancelled Jimmy Kimmel's show due to "horrible ratings and bad decisions" without influence from Trump [1] [2] [3]. This framing benefits Trump and conservative activists, who may use it to claim that the cancellation was due to Kimmel's supposed lack of popularity and poor decision-making, rather than any political influence [4]. On the other hand, ABC and Disney may benefit from a more nuanced understanding of the situation, which could help to mitigate the backlash and find a path forward for Kimmel's show [8]. The media ecosystem as a whole may also be impacted by the potential misinformation and bias in the original statement, as it could contribute to a polarized and divisive narrative around the cancellation of Kimmel's show [2] [3].