Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Was jimmy kimmels show profitable
1. Summary of the results
The profitability of Jimmy Kimmel's show is a topic of debate among various analyses. Declining viewership and advertising revenue are cited as factors that may impact the show's profitability, with one source suggesting that the show lost nearly half its audience from January 2025 to September 2025, resulting in a 45% collapse in total audience and nearly 40% collapse in the advertiser-coveted demo [1]. Another source notes that late-night TV shows, including Jimmy Kimmel's, are facing declining viewership and advertising revenue, implying that the show may not be profitable due to these declines [2]. However, other sources report that 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' brought in close to $70 million in ad revenue for ABC year-to-date [3] and that ad spending on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' totaled $51.1 million in 2024 [4], indicating that the show was generating significant revenue.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key missing context is the total production cost of Jimmy Kimmel's show, which is not provided in any of the analyses [2] [1] [5]. Without this information, it is difficult to determine the show's overall profitability. Additionally, some sources suggest that the network's decision to suspend the show may have both short and long-term effects on the network's advertising revenue [3], while others imply that the show's profitability was not a major concern for the network [6]. Alternative viewpoints include the possibility that the show's profitability may be impacted by industry-wide trends, such as declining ratings and ad revenue [5], or that the show's controversy surrounding the host may impact its profitability in the future [4].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement asks if Jimmy Kimmel's show was profitable, but does not provide any context or information about the show's production costs, advertising revenue, or other factors that may impact its profitability. This lack of context may lead to misinformation or bias in the interpretation of the show's profitability. Some sources may benefit from portraying the show as unprofitable, such as competitors or critics of the show [2] [1], while others may benefit from portraying the show as profitable, such as the network or the show's producers [3] [4]. Additionally, the timing of the show's suspension and the network's decision to pull the show may also be influenced by biases or misinformation [5] [6].