Is jimmy kimmel's late night show profitable for Disney?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The question of whether Jimmy Kimmel's late night show is profitable for Disney is complex and multifaceted. According to [1], the show may not be profitable due to declining viewership and advertising revenue, which has been a trend across major networks [1]. This viewpoint is supported by [2], which indicates that late-night TV is facing significant challenges, including declining ratings and ad revenue, suggesting that these shows may no longer be as viable for networks like Disney [2]. However, other sources, such as [3] and [4], report on the financial impact of the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show on Disney's stock price, with a drop of 1.9% and 3.5% respectively, but do not directly link this to the show's profitability [3] [4]. Furthermore, [5] suggests that pulling Jimmy Kimmel's show could lead to a loss of loyal viewers and a perception of censorship, potentially resulting in a long-term monetary risk [5]. It's also worth noting that some sources, like [6], do not provide any relevant information on the topic [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the direct financial data on Jimmy Kimmel's show, including production costs, advertising revenue, and viewership numbers, which would be necessary to determine the show's profitability [1] [2]. Additionally, the long-term impact of the suspension and potential cancellation of the show on Disney's financials is not fully explored in the provided analyses [3] [4]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the potential benefits of keeping the show on the air, including maintaining a loyal viewer base and avoiding a perception of censorship, are also not fully considered [5]. The sources also do not provide information on Jimmy Kimmel's contract and how it may affect the show's profitability, although [7] mentions that his contract is due to expire in May 2026 [7].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be biased towards the idea that Jimmy Kimmel's show is not profitable for Disney, as it does not consider alternative viewpoints or provide direct financial data to support this claim [1] [2]. The sources that report on the financial impact of the suspension, such as [3] and [4], may also be sensationalizing the story, as the drop in Disney's stock price is not directly linked to the show's profitability [3] [4]. Furthermore, some sources, like [6], do not provide any relevant information, which may indicate a lack of thorough research or a bias towards a particular narrative [6]. The beneficiaries of this framing could be competitors of Disney or individuals with a vested interest in the show's cancellation, although this is speculative and not directly supported by the analyses [5].