Has Jimmy Kimmel’s show had declining ratings
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The question about Jimmy Kimmel's show having declining ratings presents a complex picture that requires careful examination of recent events. Multiple sources consistently report that Jimmy Kimmel Live! experienced a dramatic ratings surge following Kimmel's return from a suspension in 2025, achieving record-breaking viewership numbers [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
The show's return episode drew 6.26 million total viewers, representing the highest ratings the show has seen in over a decade [4] [1]. This figure is particularly striking when compared to the show's typical performance - sources indicate that regular episodes usually attract approximately 1.42 million to 1.6 million viewers during the 2024-25 season [1] [4]. The return episode represented roughly triple to quadruple the show's average audience [3] [1].
Beyond total viewership, the show also achieved significant success in the crucial 18-49 demographic, earning a 0.87 rating - the highest single-episode performance in this demographic since March 2015 [1]. The show's YouTube presence also experienced unprecedented engagement, with Kimmel's emotional Tuesday night monologue surpassing 20 million views, ranking as his most-watched monologue of all time on the platform [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal crucial context that complicates the simple narrative of declining ratings. One source specifically notes that before the suspension, the show was indeed struggling with declining ratings, experiencing a 43% drop in total viewers from January to August 2025 [7]. This suggests that the question about declining ratings may have been accurate for a specific period leading up to the suspension.
The dramatic ratings increase appears to be directly tied to controversy and public interest surrounding Kimmel's suspension and return. Sources describe this as a "ratings bonanza" that continued beyond just the return episode [6]. The suspension itself becomes a critical missing piece of context - the analyses don't provide detailed information about what caused the suspension, but it clearly generated significant public interest and media attention.
The timing of these events is crucial for understanding the ratings trajectory. The show experienced declining viewership through much of 2025, followed by a suspension, and then record-breaking ratings upon return. This pattern suggests that external factors and controversy can dramatically impact late-night television viewership in ways that traditional programming cannot.
Additionally, the sources highlight the importance of digital engagement alongside traditional broadcast ratings. The YouTube metrics demonstrate how modern television success extends beyond linear viewership, with online content potentially reaching audiences far larger than the broadcast audience [6].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question about declining ratings, while not technically false, presents an incomplete and potentially misleading picture of the show's recent performance. By focusing solely on declining ratings without acknowledging the dramatic recent surge, the question could perpetuate outdated information about the show's current status.
The framing suggests a selective presentation of data that ignores the most recent and significant ratings developments. While the show did experience declining ratings through much of 2025 [7], asking about declining ratings without acknowledging the record-breaking return performance could be seen as cherry-picking negative information while ignoring positive developments.
The question also fails to provide temporal context - ratings in television are highly variable and can be influenced by numerous factors including current events, guest appearances, controversies, and seasonal patterns. The dramatic swing from declining ratings to record-breaking performance demonstrates how quickly television metrics can change.
Furthermore, the question doesn't acknowledge the broader context of late-night television, where all shows face challenges from changing viewing habits, streaming competition, and fragmented audiences. The fact that Kimmel achieved decade-high ratings suggests the show's fundamental appeal remains strong when circumstances align favorably.
The timing of this question becomes particularly relevant given that the most recent data shows unprecedented success rather than decline, making the focus on declining ratings potentially misleading to audiences seeking current information about the show's performance.