Have there been controversies or alternative claims about the authorship of "jingle bells"?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Claims that “Jingle Bells” was written to mock Black people trace to academic research showing the song’s earliest known public performance was in a minstrel show in Boston in 1857; scholars such as Kyna Hamill have documented that performance history but say their work is being misrepresented [1] [2]. Mainstream accounts still credit James Lord Pierpont as the composer, and historians disagree about Pierpont’s intent and the song’s original context, making the authorship and origins a subject of renewed debate rather than settled revision [3] [4] [2].
1. The traditional story: Pierpont is the credited author
For more than a century standard histories have listed James Lord Pierpont as the composer of “The One Horse Open Sleigh,” later republished as “Jingle Bells,” and municipal plaques and reference works continue to identify Pierpont and local New England settings as central to the song’s creation [3] [4]. Wikipedia and other general sources note that the precise place and date of composition remain unsettled but still attribute authorship to Pierpont, who copyrighted the song in 1857 [3] [4].
2. The revisionist thread: minstrel performance and Hamill’s research
Scholarly work beginning with a 2017 article by Boston University’s Kyna Hamill documents that the earliest known public performance of the song — under the title “One Horse Open Sleigh” — occurred in a minstrel show in Boston in September 1857 and was presented by a performer in blackface, which places the song in minstrel repertoire rather than solely parlor-song origins [1] [5]. That performance-history finding has been central to recent claims that the song’s early life was entangled with minstrelsy [1].
3. What Hamill actually says — and what she denies
Hamill’s work focused on tracing when and where the song was performed and how it circulated in nineteenth‑century popular entertainment; she has repeatedly said reporters and social posts mischaracterize her as claiming Pierpont composed the song expressly to mock Black people, a claim her research does not make [2]. Reporting cited by news outlets stresses that Hamill’s study was about performance history and context, not a declarative statement about authorial intent [2].
4. How that academic finding entered public controversy
A viral social‑media video reposted by commentator Joy Reid in December 2025 amplified the narrative that “Jingle Bells” was written to make fun of Black people, citing Hamill’s work and a Medford plaque; conservative and partisan outlets responded with criticism or dismissal, while others reported Hamill’s nuanced position that her research is being misrepresented [5] [6] [7] [2]. The fast-moving online framing compressed questions of performance history, authorial intent, and local commemoration into a single provocative claim that many outlets picked up and contested [7] [6].
5. Competing perspectives in the record
Supporters of the view that the song’s origins are tainted point to the documented minstrel performance and Pierpont’s later service in a Confederate unit as contextual indicators that require reexamination [1] [4]. Critics argue that finding a minstrel performance in the song’s early repertoire does not prove Pierpont’s motive or that the song was written primarily as racial mockery; they emphasize Pierpont’s broader biography and the lack of a direct statement of racist intent in his papers [4] [2].
6. What the sources don’t say or can’t prove
Available sources in this set do not provide direct evidence that Pierpont explicitly wrote the lyrics to “make fun of Black people,” and Hamill warns her research does not assert that conclusion [2]. The materials do not settle the question of authorial intent, nor do they resolve where exactly Pierpont composed the song — the historical record is described as “unsettled” on those specifics [3] [2].
7. Why this matters now: memory, provenance and public framing
The debate is as much about how Americans remember cultural objects as it is about one man’s biography. Hamill’s archival work changed what we know about early performances; public viral claims compressed that nuance into a moral verdict, prompting partisan responses that often ignored the scholarly caveats [1] [2] [7]. Observers on all sides have incentives — cultural guardians defending tradition, and critics seeking historical accountability — which shapes how the evidence is presented in media [7] [8].
8. Bottom line
Historians still credit James Lord Pierpont with composing the song commonly known as “Jingle Bells,” but archival research has shown its earliest public performance appeared in a minstrel context in 1857; scholars state this complicates the song’s history while stopping short of proving deliberate racist authorship, even as social‑media narratives have asserted that claim [3] [1] [2].