Are there historical controversies or myths about jingle bells origins and authorship?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Claims that “Jingle Bells” was written to mock Black people and began life as a minstrel tune have circulated repeatedly; scholars like Kyna Hamill located an 1857 playbill showing a performance of “One Horse Open Sleigh” in a minstrel program, and some recent viral posts trace the song’s minstrel-stage circulation and Pierpont’s later Confederate service [1] [2] [3]. At the same time, major histories note competing origin stories — Medford, MA vs. Savannah, GA — and that the song’s lyrics lack explicit racial content, complicating simple causal claims about authorship and intent [4] [5] [6].
1. A long-running authorship quarrel: Medford versus Savannah
Two American cities have for decades claimed James Lord Pierpont as their own and disagreed over where he actually wrote the song. Medford, Massachusetts, commemorates a 1850 composition at the Simpson Tavern with a plaque; Savannah, Georgia, points to Pierpont’s 1857 copyright and local performances and even calls its church “the Jingle Bells Church” [5] [7]. Scholars and local boosters remain split: some evidence supports performances in both places but no single definitive document settles the matter [4] [7].
2. Minstrelsy in the record — not a claim conjured in 2025
Research into nineteenth-century theatre shows “One Horse Open Sleigh” appeared in the minstrel repertoire. Kyna Hamill and other theatre historians documented a playbill from 1857 listing a performance in a minstrel show; academic work argues the song circulated in minstrel venues even as popular memory later sanitized that past [2] [1]. Reporting and scholarship connect the tune’s early public life to minstrelsy rather than inventing the link out of thin air [2] [1].
3. What the song’s words do — and do not — say
Despite the song’s later association with Christmas, the surviving lyrics are about sleigh rides, flirting and a minor accident; the best-known verses contain no overt racial references. Histories note Pierpont originally titled the piece “The One Horse Open Sleigh” in 1857 and republished it as “Jingle Bells” in 1859, and many accounts stress it was a secular sleighing song rather than a carol written for a church service [8] [5] [9].
4. Recent controversy: viral claims, public figures, and contested readings
In December 2025 a viral video reposted by commentator Joy Reid reignited debate by asserting the song “was written to make fun of Black people” and originated in blackface minstrelsy; news outlets and opinion sites covered her post and the backlash it produced [10] [11] [12]. Some outlets cite Hamill’s work as supporting a minstrel connection while others emphasize that Hamill’s scholarship warns against simplistic readings of nineteenth‑century popular music [1] [2].
5. The scholar’s caveat: context matters more than a single label
The Cambridge Theatre Survey essay and Hamill’s research do not simply declare “Jingle Bells” wholly reducible to minstrelsy; they demonstrate the song’s history is complex — performed in minstrel shows, published for broad audiences, claimed by different communities, and later repurposed as a universal holiday staple [2] [6]. Reporters and historians caution that the song’s stage circulation in minstrel programs and Pierpont’s later life (including his Confederate enlistment noted in some accounts) are pieces of a larger, contested puzzle rather than proof of a single intent at composition [3] [2].
6. Competing interpretations and the limits of current reporting
Some outlets present the minstrel connection as definitive and morally damning; others treat the link as a historical footnote or argue the claim is overblown for political effect [13] [14]. Available sources document: (a) published evidence of minstrel-era performances of the tune [2]; (b) longstanding disputes over place and date of composition [4] [7]; and (c) modern controversy driven by social media reposting [10] [1]. Sources do not give a unanimous verdict that Pierpont wrote the song expressly to mock Black people at composition — academic accounts stress nuance [2] [6].
7. What to watch for next — questions that still matter
Key open questions in reporting include whether contemporaneous documentary evidence ties Pierpont’s original intent to racist caricature beyond the fact of minstrel performance, how local commemorations chose what to remember or omit, and how present-day interpretations map nineteenth‑century practices onto modern categories of racism. Current reporting documents the minstrel-stage connection and disputed authorship claims but does not provide a single conclusive statement that the song’s lyrics were written explicitly as a racial mockery at the moment of composition [2] [4] [8].