What documented Julie Green prophecies can be timestamped and verified against public events?
Executive summary
Julie Green’s ministry posts dated prophetic “words” on its website and Rumble channel and at least one high-profile political prophecy—predicting a government overthrow/exposure for 2024—was reported in the press, creating a set of timestampable public statements [1] [2] [3]. However, public reporting and the ministry’s own pages document the statements and their posting dates rather than any independent, objective match between prophecy and subsequent public events, and available sources do not supply a systematic verification of fulfillments [4] [1].
1. What can be timestamped: the ministry’s published prophecies and dates
Julie Green Ministries publishes prophetic words on an official “Prophecies” page and categorizes entries by the date the word was received, not by upload date, which provides an internal timestamp for many items listed on the site [4] [1]. The ministry also posts video prophecies to a Rumble channel identified as “Julie Green on Rumble,” which creates publicly accessible upload dates and archived recordings that can be timestamped by viewers and researchers [3]. The ministry’s practice of dating “received” words is explicitly stated on its media page, allowing researchers to cite the ministry’s declared dates even when those differ from publication timestamps [1].
2. High-profile political prophecy documented in mainstream reporting
A widely cited example that can be timestamped in the press is the prophecy reported by Newsweek on January 2, 2024, in which Green predicted a dramatic upheaval—framed as an “overthrow” of the U.S. government or exposure/removal of those involved—positioning the message squarely in political terms and tied to 2024 expectations [2]. That Newsweek story provides an external publication date and quotes framing the content as a prophecy about forthcoming political disruption, which creates a verifiable public record of the claim and its timing [2].
3. Earlier prophetic productions and media appearances with dates
Other publicly timestampable artifacts include recorded prophetic messages such as the podcast/episode listed on IMDb from February 25, 2023, titled “Prophetic Word (Day of Victory) Has Begun — Urgent Prophecy,” which documents a specific published sermon/prophetic episode and its date in media listings [5]. Commentary by scholars and journalists that situates Green’s prophecy practice in political movements—such as Diana Butler Bass’s October 27, 2022 analysis of prophets and politics—also provides third‑party dated context linking Green’s prophetic output to broader cultural currents [6].
4. What cannot be verified from the available sources: fulfillment against public events
None of the supplied sources provide systematic, independent evidence that Green’s prophecies were fulfilled by subsequent public events; Julie Green Ministries supplies dates for when words were received or posted but not an external verification ledger of fulfilled predictions, and press coverage documents the statements rather than verifying outcomes [1] [4] [2]. Scholarly and journalistic treatments note the political resonance and potential motivations—pointing out Green’s alignment with MAGA-adjacent audiences and how prophecy functions in that ecosystem—but they do not establish a timeline proving prophecy-to-event causation or accurate prediction beyond the public timestamps of the claims themselves [2] [6].
5. Interpretation, competing views and implicit agendas to consider
Public sources offer competing readings: outlets like Newsweek treat Green’s 2024 prediction as a politically charged prophecy worthy of skepticism and scrutiny, while the ministry frames prophecies as divinely received words dated by reception and amplified via Rumble for adherents, a dynamic commentators argue amplifies political hopes and grievances rather than producing empirically falsifiable forecasts [2] [1] [6]. Researchers seeking rigorous verification should therefore differentiate between (A) timestamped, public statements and recordings that can be dated and cited (which exist in the ministry archives and press reports) and (B) claims of fulfillment, for which the provided reporting does not supply corroborating, objective matches to subsequent events [4] [1] [2].