What were the Kimmel ratings for September 23 2025 compared to the same night in 2024?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the comprehensive analysis of available sources, no direct comparison data exists for Jimmy Kimmel's ratings on September 23, 2025, versus the same night in 2024. The sources consistently indicate that specific comparative ratings data for this date is not publicly available [1] [2] [3] [4].
However, the analyses reveal significant context around Kimmel's September 23, 2025 return to television. Jimmy Kimmel returned to his ABC show after a week-long suspension, marking a highly anticipated comeback that generated substantial audience interest [5] [3]. The circumstances surrounding his return created unusual viewing conditions that likely impacted ratings performance compared to typical programming.
Preliminary ratings estimates suggest a significant spike in viewership for Kimmel's return episode. Sources indicate that early data showed ratings surged compared to recent averages, with the show typically drawing around 1.77 million viewers [5]. Industry expectations were considerably higher than normal, with networks anticipating "far more than the typical 1.6 million viewers due to the recent controversy" [6]. This suggests that September 23, 2025 represented an anomalous viewing event rather than standard programming performance.
The return episode generated exceptional digital engagement, with Kimmel's monologue "on way to breaking the host's YouTube views record" [6]. This digital performance indicator suggests significantly elevated audience interest compared to typical episodes, though it doesn't provide the specific year-over-year comparison requested.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question assumes that comparative ratings data for September 23, 2025 versus 2024 would be readily available and meaningful. However, the analyses reveal several important contextual factors missing from this assumption.
The suspension context fundamentally alters the comparison's validity. Kimmel's week-long suspension created extraordinary circumstances that make any year-over-year comparison potentially misleading [5] [3]. A suspended host's return episode represents a special event rather than routine programming, making 2024 comparisons less relevant for understanding typical performance trends.
Industry-wide broadcasting decisions also affected the comparison landscape. Some US broadcasters chose not to air Kimmel's return episode despite ABC bringing the show back [4]. This selective broadcasting approach means that even if ratings data existed, it might not reflect consistent market coverage between the two years, further complicating meaningful comparisons.
The analyses suggest that ratings methodology and measurement standards may have evolved between 2024 and 2025. References to "preliminary estimates" and varying baseline viewer numbers (1.6 million versus 1.77 million) indicate potential changes in how ratings are calculated or reported [5] [6].
Digital engagement metrics have become increasingly important for measuring show success, with YouTube views and social media reaction gaining prominence alongside traditional television ratings [6]. This shift suggests that focusing solely on traditional ratings comparisons may miss significant audience engagement changes between 2024 and 2025.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains several implicit assumptions that could lead to misleading conclusions. The question presupposes that ratings data for both dates exists and is publicly accessible, when industry practice often involves delayed or limited release of specific date comparisons, particularly for special circumstances like host returns after suspensions.
The framing suggests that a direct comparison would be meaningful, despite the extraordinary circumstances surrounding September 23, 2025. Comparing a controversial return episode to routine 2024 programming could generate misleading impressions about show performance trends or audience preferences.
The question's focus on a single date comparison ignores broader industry context and seasonal viewing patterns. Television ratings fluctuate significantly based on competing programming, news events, and seasonal factors that make isolated date comparisons potentially deceptive without broader context.
The emphasis on traditional ratings metrics may reflect outdated measurement priorities. Modern television success increasingly depends on multi-platform engagement, streaming numbers, and social media impact rather than solely traditional broadcast ratings [6]. Focusing exclusively on conventional ratings comparisons could misrepresent actual audience engagement and show influence.
Finally, the question's timing assumes immediate availability of comprehensive ratings data, when industry standard practice often involves delayed reporting and analysis, particularly for controversial or special programming events.