Are there any civil lawsuits filed against Kody Brown in 2025 and what are the allegations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Christine Brown filed a civil lawsuit against ex-husband Kody Brown in September 2024 seeking paternity, custody and child support (including retroactive support) for their daughter Truely; the matter was classified by court filings as a “significant custody dispute” with mediation set for May 21, 2025 [1] [2]. Kody has filed a legal response/counterclaim and reporting describes claims ranging from adding his name to Truely’s birth certificate to requests for injunctions limiting harassment and travel [3] [1] [4].
1. What was filed and who filed it — the basics
Christine Brown filed suit against Kody Brown on or around September 16, 2024; the complaint seeks to establish paternity, obtain custody rights, add Kody’s name to the child’s birth certificate, and pursue child support including retroactive payments for their daughter Truely [1] [5]. Multiple entertainment outlets reported the filing and described it as a formal custody and child support action initiated by Christine [1] [5].
2. How the courts have treated the case so far
Court documents obtained by reporting show the case was classified as a “significant custody dispute” and the parties were ordered to attend mediation on May 21, 2025; disclosures were completed by both sides before that mediation [2] [4]. Media outlets describe ongoing court activity through late 2024 into 2025, consistent with a civil family-law process rather than criminal proceedings [2] [4].
3. Allegations and remedies Christine is seeking
Reporting lists several specific remedies Christine requested: a legal determination of paternity, custody of Truely, retroactive child support, and a domestic relations injunction that would bar harassment, restrict non-routine travel with the child, and prohibit disparagement of either party [1] [4]. Screen Rant frames Christine’s motivation as seeking financial support and parental rights given the couple’s prior spiritual (non-legal) union and Truely’s move to Utah [6].
4. Kody’s response and counterclaims
Kody has “lawyered up” and filed a formal response to Christine’s custody/child support lawsuit; some outlets say he filed a counterclaim related to the paternity request and other issues, although precise counterclaim details vary across reports [3] [7]. One report indicates Kody may have submitted a countersuit that raises questions about birth-certificate records and the legal posture of the parties [7] [3].
5. Context: why this became a court issue now
Reporters and commentators place the suit in the context of the Browns’ public, plural-marriage history: Christine and Kody were in a spiritual union for years rather than a legal marriage, complicating legal claims and prompting Christine to seek Utah relief to establish paternity and support [6] [5]. Outlets suggest the filing follows years of separation and Truely’s relocation to Utah with Christine, which factor into the custody dispute [5] [4].
6. Media coverage, tone and competing perspectives
Coverage comes primarily from entertainment and celebrity outlets; some frame the suit as an effort to force financial responsibility and legal recognition [1] [6], while others emphasize procedural milestones (mediations, disclosures) and note Kody’s formal legal responses [2] [3]. Sources differ on emphasis: Screen Rant and RealityTea focus on legal-strategy explanations, while tabloids and fan sites highlight timing and family drama [6] [8].
7. What available sources do not mention
Available sources do not mention final outcomes of the May 21, 2025 mediation or any court rulings on custody, paternity, or child support beyond the procedural steps and filings cited [2] [4]. They also do not provide sealed court documents or complete texts of complaints and counterclaims, so specifics such as exact monetary amounts sought or any settlement terms are not available in current reporting [1] [3].
8. Why this matters beyond tabloid headlines
The case illustrates legal complications when long-term spiritual unions intersect with family law: establishing paternity and enforcing support for children of non-legal marriages requires civil actions that can reshape parental rights and responsibilities [6] [1]. Sources point out broader implications for former plural wives who lack marital legal protections and who may have to pursue the courts for financial and custodial relief [6].
Sources referenced: reporting from IMDb, The Ashley’s Reality Roundup, RealityTea, Screen Rant, Us Weekly, and related entertainment coverage [1] [2] [4] [6] [5] [3].