Is lady gaga cannibal according to photos of epstein

Checked on February 6, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Lady Gaga is not shown to be a cannibal in the recently released Jeffrey Epstein files or in any verified photographs from those documents; the files include mentions of Gaga in correspondence and social chatter but contain no evidence linking her to cannibalism or ritualistic abuse [1] [2] [3]. A widely circulated image tying Gaga to Epstein island rituals has been debunked: the original photo is from a 2013 charity party and not connected to Epstein’s properties [4].

1. What the released Epstein files actually contain

The Department of Justice disclosure was massive — described by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche as roughly 180,000 images and more than 2,000 videos within a roughly 3.5 million-page release — and that trove includes emails, images and notes that reference many public figures in different contexts [1]. Reporting and document reviewers warn the publication is disordered and often lacks context, with driver’s licenses, names and images released without clear explanation of ties to Epstein or relevance, making simple conclusions from isolated pages hazardous [2].

2. Where Lady Gaga appears in those records — and what that means

Lady Gaga is mentioned in some of the materials — for example as a suggested guest or as someone whose foundation drew Epstein’s interest — but the references in reporting amount to name-checks and party-invite type mentions rather than criminal allegations; the “visitor list” purportedly showing island guests has not been identified among the official releases cited by news outlets [1]. Multiple outlets emphasized that being referenced in Epstein’s correspondence or in third-party notes does not equate to proof of misconduct, and the published corpus does not by itself substantiate criminal activity by every person named [1] [2].

3. The cannibalism allegations in the files — what’s documented and what isn’t

The newly public documents and historical interviews contain shocking unverified allegations — including references to “ritualistic sacrifice” and claims by an anonymous source about atrocities — but investigators and fact-checkers stress those are unsupported statements in the files rather than corroborated evidence; Snopes’ review found such allegations stem from an interview that provided no verifiable proof and, in some cases, the witness did not even allege cannibalism in the original account [3]. News coverage has repeatedly noted there is no judicial finding or credible forensic evidence in the DOJ release proving Epstein or associates engaged in cannibalism [5] [6].

4. The viral photo linking Gaga to island rituals has been debunked

A particular image circulated online claiming to show Marina Abramović and Lady Gaga on Epstein’s island was traced back to Getty Images as part of a July 27, 2013 charity event in Southampton, with Gaga photographed beside Abramović at a public fundraiser — a provenance that contradicts the viral claim tying the image to Epstein’s island [4]. Fact-checkers concluded the photograph’s original caption and publication history demonstrate the image is unrelated to Epstein’s properties, and that misattribution has driven false narratives about participants’ involvement in alleged island activity [4].

5. Why these claims spread and the limits of the public record

The combination of a massive, poorly organized public dump, sensational snippets in emails or interviews, and pre-existing viral allegations (such as the Gabriela Rico Jiménez clip) creates fertile ground for rumor; multiple outlets emphasize social posts amplified by lack of context rather than new corroboration, and some items circulated online predate the DOJ release and were simply re-shared alongside it [2] [6] [7]. Responsible reporting and fact-checking note that the presence of disturbing text in the files demands scrutiny but not automatic acceptance — several media and verification organizations stress the difference between allegations recorded in files and evidence substantiated by investigation [3].

6. Bottom line: is Lady Gaga “cannibal” according to Epstein photos?

No credible evidence in the released DOJ/Epstein materials shows Lady Gaga engaging in cannibalism or being depicted as a participant in any such acts; mentions of her in the files amount to social references and proposed invitations, and the single widely shared photo tying her to island rituals has been debunked as coming from a 2013 charity event, not Epstein’s island [1] [4] [3]. The documents do contain unverified, graphic allegations about cannibalism in the broader sense, but fact-checkers and reporting uniformly treat those claims as unproven and unsupported by corroborating evidence in the public record [5] [6] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What specific Lady Gaga mentions appear in the DOJ Epstein document release and in what context?
Which photographs in the Epstein file release have been independently verified and which have been debunked?
How have fact-checkers evaluated the Gabriela Rico Jiménez cannibalism claims in relation to the Epstein documents?