Fact check: The Last Jedi was a complete betrayal of the character of Luke Skywalker for Rian Johnson's.shit ego.

1. Summary of the results

The debate over Luke Skywalker's portrayal in The Last Jedi is more nuanced than the original statement suggests. While some sources argue it was a betrayal of his character ^{[1] [2]}, others present evidence that his actions are actually consistent with his established character traits ^{[3] [4] [5]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:

• Luke has historically demonstrated struggles with emotional control and darkness throughout the original trilogy, including using Force choke techniques and nearly beating Vader in anger ^[5]
• His rejection of violence and focus on peace in The Last Jedi actually aligns with his core principles from Return of the Jedi, particularly in how he handled Vader's redemption ^[3]
• The film presents Luke's character development as a realistic human response to failure, specifically regarding Ben Solo's training ^[6]
• His actions can be viewed as a natural progression rather than a betrayal, considering the significant time gap between Return of the Jedi and The Last Jedi ^[6]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement shows several biases:

• It oversimplifies a complex character arc by ignoring Luke's established history of emotional struggles and darkness ^[4]
• It attributes malicious intent to director Rian Johnson without considering the artistic and narrative reasons behind the portrayal
• The debate benefits different groups:
• Star Wars purists benefit from maintaining an idealized version of Luke Skywalker ^[2]
• Film critics and analysts benefit from deeper character exploration and subversion of traditional hero narratives ^[6]
• Disney/Lucasfilm benefits from generating controversy and discussion around their creative decisions

The truth appears to lie somewhere between complete betrayal and perfect consistency, with valid arguments on both sides supported by examples from the original trilogy.