Did Leonardo DiCaprio appear on Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs or travel manifestues?

1. What the papers actually say — name‑drops, depositions and lists

Multiple news reports recount that Leonardo DiCaprio was “mentioned” or “name‑dropped” in recently unsealed court records tied to Jeffrey Epstein, most prominently in the deposition of Johanna Sjoberg, who said Epstein would sometimes say things like “that was Leonardo” while on the phone, but also explicitly stated she had never met DiCaprio — language those outlets highlight as second‑hand and anecdotal rather than documentary proof of contact ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

2. Flight logs, manifests and the difference between appearance and verification

Some summaries and compilations of the so‑called “Epstein files” list many high‑profile names drawn from contact books, flight logs, agendas and depositions, and those aggregations occasionally include DiCaprio among other celebrities reported to have been “tied” to Epstein’s planes or islands ^{[5] [6] [7]}. At the same time, multiple outlets carrying those lists and commentators explicitly warn that inclusion in a document or database does not equal proof someone was a passenger, and that the files contain a mixture of flight manifests, contact lists and witness testimony of varying reliability ^{[7] [3]}.

3. Where the strongest public claim about DiCaprio comes from — witness testimony, not a manifest

The clearest public reference in the sources supplied is the Sjoberg deposition’s recounting of Epstein boasting about knowing celebrities, which is a testimonial anecdote rather than a contemporaneous manifest or signed flight log that places DiCaprio aboard a specific flight; major outlets covering the release treated that as second‑hand and noted Sjoberg’s admission she had not met DiCaprio, which weakens any claim that a reliable manifest exists in the public record cited here ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Conflicting coverage and how lists get amplified

Some outlets and aggregated lists presented DiCaprio among “names linked” to Epstein in broad sweeps of released files, and those headlines have been amplified across press and social media, creating an impression of concrete inclusion that the underlying text does not uniformly support ^{[5] [8] [3]}. Reporting from The Guardian and other reputable sources stresses that many of the celebrity mentions in the documents are collateral or hearsay, and that reputational damage can arise simply from proximity in those caches even absent corroborating flight manifests ^[2].

5. What can and cannot be concluded from the supplied reporting

From the materials provided, the responsible conclusion is that Leonardo DiCaprio’s name appears in the corpus of Epstein‑related documents primarily as a name‑drop in deposition testimony and as an item listed in various public compilations, but the supplied reporting does not provide a verified contemporaneous flight manifest or incontrovertible flight log entry proving he traveled on Epstein’s planes; several sources explicitly caution that names in the files do not equal evidence of participation in crimes or of being a passenger ^{[1] [6] [3]}.

6. Alternative interpretations, motivations and gaps in public records

Alternative viewpoints exist in the reporting: some aggregations treat any appearance in the files as meaningful and compile celebrity rosters accordingly, while other outlets and legal observers argue for caution and context because the files mix contact lists, agendas and depositional memory — and the White House’s selective release and distribution of Epstein documents to influencers has itself been criticized as politically charged, which could shape which fragments of the record get amplified ^{[3] [7]}. The supplied sources do not include a publicly released, authenticated flight manifest that names DiCaprio; if such a manifest exists beyond the materials cited here, it is not part of this reporting ^[6].