Lipoless Jennifer Aston

Checked on January 3, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

An online weight‑loss product called "Lipoless" has been marketed using imagery and quotes that imply endorsement by ABC News physician Dr. Jennifer Ashton, but multiple fact‑checks and Dr. Ashton’s own statements make clear she has no connection to those supplements; consumer reports and scam trackers show people were targeted and sometimes defrauded by those promotions [1] [2] [3]. Independent review sites and complaint threads describe deceptive ad tactics—deepfake/AI video red flags, broken ingredient labels, and high‑pressure sales calls—consistent with common affiliate‑marketing scams rather than an authentic medical endorsement [4] [3] [1].

1. What the evidence actually shows about Dr. Jennifer Ashton and Lipoless

Multiple sources document that Dr. Jennifer Ashton’s name and likeness have been used in online ads for pills such as Lipoless and similar products, and that Dr. Ashton publicly denied any relationship with these products, saying she did not endorse keto gummies, CBD gummies or supplements promoted in scam ads [1] [2]. A lifestyle/health site summarizing the issue notes Ashton has “no connection” to Lipoless and similar brands and that her image is being appropriated to create false credibility for these supplements [1]. The Yahoo fact check traces a pattern of scammers creating videos and websites to falsely attribute endorsements to her, and notes Ashton issued statements to correct the record [2].

2. How the scam mechanics present themselves to consumers

Consumer complaint repositories and review pages show a recurring playbook: social‑media promotions that feature lengthy “infomercial” style content claiming celebrity doctor endorsements, broken ingredient labels on vendor sites, and unsolicited follow‑up phone calls offering “discounts,” all of which are classic red flags for deceptive supplement marketing [3] [4]. Trustpilot reviewers and BBB Scam Tracker entries recount being targeted by Facebook promotions promising one‑tablet daily weight loss while invoking high‑profile names to manufacture trust, suggesting a coordinated affiliate marketing or ad‑fraud operation rather than a bona fide medical recommendation [3] [4].

3. Signals of fakery and the role of AI/deepfakes

Reviewers on Trustpilot flagged the videos as AI‑generated and pointed to nonfunctional ingredient links and missing label photos on Lipoless sites as evidence the vendors were not transparent about product composition [4]. Fact‑checking outlets and Ashton’s own public notes underline that manipulated clips or fabricated testimonials are being used to mislead viewers into believing an on‑air endorsement occurred [2] [1]. Where reporting documents explicit deepfake use it strengthens the case that viewers were being manipulated, though available sources do not quantify how many ads used fully synthesized footage versus photo or quote theft [2] [4].

4. Consumer harm and the limits of the available reporting

BBB warnings and user complaints describe financial loss and confusion—people reporting purchases and aggressive sales contacts after seeing Ashton‑branded ads—illustrating concrete consumer harm even where medical risk is unclear [3] [4]. However, the provided sources do not include regulatory enforcement actions, lab analyses of Lipoless product contents, or a statement from the Lipoless vendor responding to these allegations, so conclusions about product safety or the full corporate structure behind the ads cannot be drawn from the available reporting [3] [4].

5. Who benefits and what to watch for next

Affiliate networks and unscrupulous direct‑to‑consumer supplement marketers benefit when high‑traffic platforms amplify forged endorsements that drive impulse buys; ad platforms that insufficiently police content and payment processors that enable recurring charges also play enabling roles, according to the patterns recorded in complaints and fact checks [3] [2]. The clearest immediate action suggested by the sources is media literacy: treat celebrity doctor mentions in social ads as suspect unless confirmed on the physician’s official channels, and report deceptive ads to platforms and consumer protection agencies—Dr. Ashton’s own social posts and fact‑checks have been used to push back against this scam wave [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
How have social‑media deepfakes been used to promote health scams in recent years?
What steps do the BBB and FTC take after multiple consumer complaints about a dietary supplement ad campaign?
How can consumers verify whether a medical professional truly endorses a supplement?