Fact check: I though Megan could not give birth to a child

1. Summary of the results

The analyses overwhelmingly contradict the original statement. Meghan Markle successfully gave birth to two children: Archie and Lilibet ^{[1] [2]}. The sources confirm that she experienced postpartum pre-eclampsia, described as a "rare and scary medical condition," but this occurred after giving birth, not preventing her from doing so ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

Official birth records list Meghan as the biological mother of both children ^[4], directly refuting any claims about her inability to give birth. Healthcare professionals have defended the appearance of her pregnancy, noting that "all bumps look different" and citing examples of other mothers with similar-looking baby bumps ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement appears to stem from several conspiracy theories that have circulated about Meghan Markle's pregnancies:

• "Meghan Moonbump" theories suggesting she faked her pregnancies using prosthetic bumps ^[6]
• Surrogacy allegations promoted by Meghan's estranged family members, including her father and half-sister, who have fueled speculation about the births ^[7]
• Unverified claims that she "privately admitted to faking her pregnancy with Archie," though this appears to be rumor without credible support ^[8]

These theories reflect a broader pattern of targeted misinformation and trolling that Meghan has faced since joining the royal family ^[4]. The sources highlight the public's intense fascination with royal pregnancies and births, which has contributed to the spread of these unfounded theories ^[6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement contains significant misinformation. It contradicts established facts about Meghan Markle's successful pregnancies and births. The statement may have been influenced by:

• Conspiracy theories that have been thoroughly debunked by official records and medical professionals
• Targeted disinformation campaigns designed to undermine Meghan's credibility ^[4]
• Sensationalized media coverage that amplifies unverified claims for engagement

The persistence of these false narratives, despite clear evidence to the contrary, demonstrates how misinformation can spread and persist even when contradicted by documented facts. Those who benefit from promoting such theories include tabloid media seeking clicks and individuals with personal vendettas against Meghan Markle, particularly her estranged family members who have actively promoted these unfounded claims ^[7].