Did Miranda Lambert expose Trumps grades from Wharton
Executive summary
No credible reporting in the provided sources indicates that country star Miranda Lambert "exposed" Donald Trump’s grades from the Wharton School; there is extensive reporting that Trump’s actual Wharton grades and GPA remain undisclosed and contested, while the Lambert material in the dataset is music coverage with no link to academic records [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What the claim would mean and why it circulated
A claim that Miranda Lambert exposed Trump’s Wharton grades would require publication or release of official transcripts or authenticated grade lists tied to Trump; the available fact-checking and reporting makes clear that Trump has never released his transcripts and that his academic record at Wharton is a longstanding mystery discussed by journalists and alumni alike [1] [5]. None of the music- or entertainment-focused items in the sources mention Lambert acting as a whistleblower or producing documents about Trump’s academic performance [3] [4] [6], so any social-media claim that she “exposed” grades would run counter to the documentary record present in these sources.
2. What the record actually shows about Trump’s Wharton performance
Multiple investigations and contemporaneous records show that Trump’s boasting about being a top student is disputed: Penn-era lists and alumni recollections do not include Trump on the Dean’s List or among published academic honors for the Class of 1968, and news outlets have characterized his Wharton GPA as opaque because official transcripts have not been released for verification [2] [1]. Long-form reporting frames Trump’s relationship with Wharton as “shrouded in secrecy,” noting that classmates and archival programs do not corroborate his public claims of class superlatives [5] [2].
3. Where Miranda Lambert appears in the available reporting
The Miranda Lambert material in the dataset is strictly cultural coverage — album reviews, performance writeups, and her official website — and none of it documents an action in which she obtained or published university records about Donald Trump [3] [4] [6]. Those sources discuss her music, public performances, and career, not involvement in academic-document leaks; therefore there is no evidentiary basis in the provided reporting to connect Lambert to any exposure of Wharton grades.
4. Why the rumor is plausible but unsupported by these sources
Trump’s repeated public references to Wharton and the lack of released transcripts make the subject fertile ground for rumor, satire, or politically motivated assertions — reporters explicitly note the “mystery” around his record and the gap between his boasts and archival evidence [5] [1]. That opacity creates an environment where third parties or celebrities might be falsely credited with revelations they did not make; however, the dataset contains no primary or credible secondary source tying Lambert to such a revelation, so plausibility is not evidence [5] [2] [3].
5. Alternate explanations, motives and the limits of available reporting
An alternate explanation for any viral claim linking Lambert to Trump’s grades is misattribution or deliberate misinformation intended to attach a sensational narrative to a well-known public figure; entertainment reporting may be amplified into political rumor without verification [3] [4]. The sources here document the lack of released transcripts and archival inconsistencies about Trump’s Wharton record [1] [2] but do not include investigative reporting showing Lambert obtained or published grades, so the limitation of the dataset means no definitive statement can be made beyond: there is no evidence in these sources that Miranda Lambert exposed Trump’s Wharton grades.